coreboot December 2007

coreboot@coreboot.org

78 participants
271 discussions

[LinuxBIOS] cmos.layout field meanings.
by Steve Isaacs 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

For my design review I'm trying to document the meaning of the various fields in CMOS RAM. I've done some grepping and found limited use of the generated CMOS_VSTART_ and CMOS_VLEN_ definitions which are generated from the board's cmos.layout. Also, I've found a number of inconsistencies regarding checksum calculation. For example CMOS_VSTART_check_sum is defined in cmos.layout as 984 for some (most?) boards but the file pc80/mc146818rtc.h defines the checksum range as bytes 16 (PC_CKS_RANGE_START) thru 45 (PC_CKS_RANGE_END) which is then used by the rtc_init to verify CMOS RAM contents. Why wouldn't cmos.layout be used for both? I'm sensing some bit position dependent coupling between execution in CAR and execution from RAM using different definitions which may cause problems if cmos.layout is changed for a board. It appears there may be some additional coupling for bootloaders as well? (e.g. boot_first, boot_second, etc.) Is there a document I can read to help me understand this? Am I looking at this wrong? Thanks, Steve

3 3

[LinuxBIOS] r87 - buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader
by svn＠openbios.org 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

Author: myles Date: 2007-12-19 21:13:22 +0100 (Wed, 19 Dec 2007) New Revision: 87 Modified: buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch Log: Trivial removal of doubled patch lines, didn't break the build, just not needed. Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <myles(a)pel.cs.byu.edu> Acked-by: Myles Watson <myles(a)pel.cs.byu.edu> Modified: buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch =================================================================== --- buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch 2007-12-19 19:52:21 UTC (rev 86) +++ buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch 2007-12-19 20:13:22 UTC (rev 87) @@ -15,22 +15,3 @@ + $(PROGS): $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $@.c -nostdlib -o $@ - ---- kexec-boot-loader.org/Makefile 2007-12-07 10:28:26.000000000 -0700 -+++ kexec-boot-loader/Makefile 2007-12-07 10:28:47.000000000 -0700 -@@ -18,6 +18,15 @@ - - all: olpc-boot-loader - -+kexec/x86-setup-32.o: -+ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-32.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ -+ -+kexec/x86-setup-16.o: -+ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-16.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ -+ -+kexec/x86-setup-16-debug.o: -+ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-16-debug.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ -+ - $(PROGS): - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $@.c -nostdlib -o $@ -

1 0

[LinuxBIOS] SMBIOS tables or alternate.
by Steve Isaacs 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

Because of a need to be compatible with other systems I'm seeing a requirement to support SMBIOS tables. I did some quick searching and didn't find much regarding this subject on the LinuxBIOS web site or the source code. Specifically, the _SM_ pattern (SMMBIOS spec) needs to be embedded along with DMI blocks such as System Information (0x01), Base Board Information (0x02), System Encloser or Chassis (0x03) at a minimum. The commandline utility dumpSmbios (or similar) would be used to retrieve this information. >From an application perspective this is important information. The same application needs to run on platforms having different BIOSes -- some commercial, some LinuxBIOS. The hardware type and version information is important for maintaining and deploying the application. Because of this, the application needs a consistent mechanism for retrieving the information I listed above. Any suggestions or alternatives? Thanks, Steve

4 5

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Broken build for kexec-boot-loader in buildrom x86_64?
by Myles Watson 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

Did the patch work for anyone else? Any concerns? Thanks, Myles On Dec 7, 2007 10:45 AM, Myles Watson <myles(a)pel.cs.byu.edu> wrote: > On Dec 3, 2007 10:23 AM, Myles Watson <myles(a)pel.cs.byu.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > buildrom gives me still an error when building kexec-boot-loader > > > (x86_64) for the m57sli: > > > > > > gcc --32 -c -o kexec/x86-setup-32.o kexec/x86-setup-32.S > > > cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-f32" > > > > > > This has been reported for the tyan_s2891 before: > > > > > > http://www.linuxbios.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2007-November/026649.html > > > > > > Did I something wrong? > > > > You didn't do anything wrong. Jordan's response to my email was: > > > > "It looks like it got the ASFLAGS when it wanted the CFLAGS." > > > > I haven't looked at it more, but I hope that helps. > > The attached patch fixes the build for me. I've included it > separately (cross_compile.patch), and as a patch to buildrom > (kbl_compile.patch). > > It looks like a case where make was too smart, so it used the > assembler for the .S files, and the build environment hadn't > overwritten the assembler flags. > > Myles > > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <myles(a)pel.cs.byu.edu> >

2 4

[LinuxBIOS] r86 - buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader
by svn＠openbios.org 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

Author: myles Date: 2007-12-19 20:52:21 +0100 (Wed, 19 Dec 2007) New Revision: 86 Added: buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch Modified: buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/kexec-boot-loader.mk Log: This patch explicitly uses gcc to build the .S files, so that the correct flags get passed in. Added: buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch =================================================================== --- buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch (rev 0) +++ buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch 2007-12-19 19:52:21 UTC (rev 86) @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +--- kexec-boot-loader.org/Makefile 2007-12-07 10:28:26.000000000 -0700 ++++ kexec-boot-loader/Makefile 2007-12-07 10:28:47.000000000 -0700 +@@ -18,6 +18,15 @@ + + all: olpc-boot-loader + ++kexec/x86-setup-32.o: ++ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-32.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ ++ ++kexec/x86-setup-16.o: ++ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-16.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ ++ ++kexec/x86-setup-16-debug.o: ++ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-16-debug.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ ++ + $(PROGS): + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $@.c -nostdlib -o $@ + +--- kexec-boot-loader.org/Makefile 2007-12-07 10:28:26.000000000 -0700 ++++ kexec-boot-loader/Makefile 2007-12-07 10:28:47.000000000 -0700 +@@ -18,6 +18,15 @@ + + all: olpc-boot-loader + ++kexec/x86-setup-32.o: ++ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-32.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ ++ ++kexec/x86-setup-16.o: ++ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-16.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ ++ ++kexec/x86-setup-16-debug.o: ++ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) kexec/x86-setup-16-debug.S -nostdlib -c -o $@ ++ + $(PROGS): + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $@.c -nostdlib -o $@ + Modified: buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/kexec-boot-loader.mk =================================================================== --- buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/kexec-boot-loader.mk 2007-12-14 14:23:56 UTC (rev 85) +++ buildrom-devel/packages/kexec-boot-loader/kexec-boot-loader.mk 2007-12-19 19:52:21 UTC (rev 86) @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ KBL_TARGET=$(INITRD_DIR)/kbl endif +KBL_PATCHES += $(PACKAGE_DIR)/kexec-boot-loader/cross_compile.patch + ifeq ($(CONFIG_VERBOSE),y) KBL_BUILD_LOG=/dev/stdout KBL_INSTALL_LOG=/dev/stdout

1 0

[LinuxBIOS] r3020 build service
by LinuxBIOS information 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

Dear LinuxBIOS readers! This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS. The developer "cozzie" checked in revision 3020 to the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following changes: Change Log: Fix for newer iasl versions (trivial) Signed-off-by: Corey Osgood <corey.osgood(a)gmail.com> Acked-by: Corey Osgood <corey.osgood(a)gmail.com> Build Log: Compilation of amd:serengeti_cheetah_fam10 is still broken See the error log at http://qa.linuxbios.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=3020&device=serengeti_che… If something broke during this checkin please be a pain in cozzie's neck until the issue is fixed. If this issue is not fixed within 24h the revision should be backed out. Best regards, LinuxBIOS automatic build system

1 0

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r3018 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/amd/serengeti_cheetah_fam10
by Marc Jones 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

svn(a)openbios.org wrote: > Author: cozzie > Date: 2007-12-19 09:07:37 +0100 (Wed, 19 Dec 2007) > New Revision: 3018 > > Modified: > trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/amd/serengeti_cheetah_fam10/Config.lb > Log: > Small fix to make the abuild happy, add ROM_SIZE to target/*/Config.lb, > using the default from src/mainboard/*/Options.lb (trivial) > > Signed-off-by: Corey Osgood <corey.osgood(a)gmail.com> > Acked-by: Corey Osgood <corey.osgood(a)gmail.com> > > Thanks Corey. Marc -- Marc Jones Senior Firmware Engineer (970) 226-9684 Office mailto:Marc.Jones@amd.com http://www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors

3 7

[LinuxBIOS] r3021 - in trunk/LinuxBIOSv2: src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10 targets/amd/serengeti_cheetah_fam10
by svn＠openbios.org 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

Author: cozzie Date: 2007-12-19 20:30:36 +0100 (Wed, 19 Dec 2007) New Revision: 3021 Added: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/amd/serengeti_cheetah_fam10/Config-abuild.lb Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/Config.lb Log: More abuild fixes, this should be the last (trivial) Signed-off-by: Corey Osgood <corey.osgood(a)gmail.com> Acked-by: Corey Osgood <corey.osgood(a)gmail.com> Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/Config.lb =================================================================== --- trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/Config.lb 2007-12-19 18:29:59 UTC (rev 3020) +++ trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/Config.lb 2007-12-19 19:30:36 UTC (rev 3021) @@ -34,42 +34,42 @@ object amdfam10_acpi.o makerule ssdt.c depends "$(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/ssdt.dsl" - action "iasl -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/ssdt.dsl" + action "iasl -p $(PWD)/ssdt -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/ssdt.dsl" action "perl -pi -e 's/AmlCode/AmlCode_ssdt/g' ssdt.hex" action "mv ssdt.hex ssdt.c" end object ./ssdt.o makerule sspr1.c depends "$(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr1.dsl" - action "iasl -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr1.dsl" + action "iasl -p $(PWD)/sspr1 -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr1.dsl" action "perl -pi -e 's/AmlCode/AmlCode_sspr1/g' sspr1.hex" action "mv sspr1.hex sspr1.c" end object ./sspr1.o makerule sspr2.c depends "$(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr2.dsl" - action "iasl -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr2.dsl" + action "iasl -p $(PWD)/sspr2 -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr2.dsl" action "perl -pi -e 's/AmlCode/AmlCode_sspr2/g' sspr2.hex" action "mv sspr2.hex sspr2.c" end object ./sspr2.o makerule sspr3.c depends "$(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr3.dsl" - action "iasl -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr3.dsl" + action "iasl -p $(PWD)/sspr3 -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr3.dsl" action "perl -pi -e 's/AmlCode/AmlCode_sspr3/g' sspr3.hex" action "mv sspr3.hex sspr3.c" end object ./sspr3.o makerule sspr4.c depends "$(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr4.dsl" - action "iasl -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr4.dsl" + action "iasl -p $(PWD)/sspr4 -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr4.dsl" action "perl -pi -e 's/AmlCode/AmlCode_sspr4/g' sspr4.hex" action "mv sspr4.hex sspr4.c" end object ./sspr4.o makerule sspr5.c depends "$(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr5.dsl" - action "iasl -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr5.dsl" + action "iasl -p $(PWD)/sspr5 -tc $(TOP)/src/northbridge/amd/amdfam10/sspr5.dsl" action "perl -pi -e 's/AmlCode/AmlCode_sspr5/g' sspr5.hex" action "mv sspr5.hex sspr5.c" end Added: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/amd/serengeti_cheetah_fam10/Config-abuild.lb =================================================================== --- trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/amd/serengeti_cheetah_fam10/Config-abuild.lb (rev 0) +++ trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/amd/serengeti_cheetah_fam10/Config-abuild.lb 2007-12-19 19:30:36 UTC (rev 3021) @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +# This will make a target directory of ./VENDOR_MAINBOARD + +target VENDOR_MAINBOARD +mainboard VENDOR/MAINBOARD + +option CC="CROSSCC" +option CROSS_COMPILE="CROSS_PREFIX" +option HOSTCC="CROSS_HOSTCC" + +__COMPRESSION__ + +option ROM_SIZE=1024*1024 + +romimage "fallback" + option USE_FALLBACK_IMAGE=1 + option ROM_IMAGE_SIZE=0x20000 + option LINUXBIOS_EXTRA_VERSION=".0-fallback" + payload __PAYLOAD__ +end + +romimage "failover" + option USE_FAILOVER_IMAGE=1 + option USE_FALLBACK_IMAGE=0 + option ROM_IMAGE_SIZE=FAILOVER_SIZE + option XIP_ROM_SIZE=FAILOVER_SIZE + option LINUXBIOS_EXTRA_VERSION=".0-failover" +end + +buildrom ./linuxbios.rom ROM_SIZE "fallback" "failover" \ No newline at end of file

1 0

[LinuxBIOS] Tyan S2891 LinuxBios VGA ROM Question.
by Nate 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

I had a question about the linuxbios build tutorial for the Tyan S2891. (http://linuxbios.org/Tyan_S2891_Build_Tutorial) The tutorial mentioned to concatenate the VGA video ROM from Tyan's original bios with the tyan-s2891.rom from buildrom. The question I have is after reading http://linuxbios.org/VGA_support it seems as though I do not need to concatenate a video bios because i have an nvidea addon VGA card. I do not want to use the on board VGA chip. Now after I try to flashrom the "tyan-s2891.rom" file, I get a size mismatch because the rom built is only 988K and I have a 1024K rom. Is it necessary that I concatenate a 36K VGA rom? If not, how to I get buildrom to build a 1024K rom rather than a 988K rom? Thanks in advance, Nate --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

2 1

[LinuxBIOS] r3019 build service
by LinuxBIOS information 19 Dec '07

19 Dec '07

Dear LinuxBIOS readers! This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS. The developer "stepan" checked in revision 3019 to the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following changes: Change Log: trivial fix for abuild. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan(a)coresystems.de> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan(a)coresystems.de> Build Log: Configuration of amd:serengeti_cheetah_fam10 has been fixed If something broke during this checkin please be a pain in stepan's neck until the issue is fixed. If this issue is not fixed within 24h the revision should be backed out. Best regards, LinuxBIOS automatic build system

1 0

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
28
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

coreboot December 2007