Hi guys, I am looking for gigabyte contacts to request a mainboard donation because I want add support to it on LBdistro.
I contacted Gigabyte Brazil (Digitrom) but they don't manufacture this board here in Brazil and don't make efforts to contact Gigabyte international do request one.
Then if someone has a channel of communication with Gigabyte let me know.
Cheers,
Alan
Hello,
I'm running Fedora 7 with Xen kernel on this motherboard with AMD 6000+ CPU. Virtual Machine Manager tells me Virtualization is disabled in the BIOS. Originally I was using BIOS version F8. Gigabyte gave me a beta copy (F9a) but it didn't help. My question is: does Linux BIOS enable Virtualization on this board so it will work properly with Xen?
Thanks in advance.
John ================
On 6/27/07, john selmys@lotuspond.ca wrote:
Hello,
I'm running Fedora 7 with Xen kernel on this motherboard with AMD
6000+ CPU. Virtual Machine Manager tells me Virtualization is disabled in the BIOS. Originally I was using BIOS version F8. Gigabyte gave me a beta copy (F9a) but it didn't help. My question is: does Linux BIOS enable Virtualization on this board so it will work properly with Xen?
it is enabled by default.
for using xen with LinuxBIOS in Rev F and later: You need to use LinuxBIOS + Kernel + kexec + to load xen.
there is amd64 buildrom that you can used, and put compiled kexec with static on /boot.
It seems i sent the kexec shell scripts some time ago. you could dig it out. otherwise I could resent it tonight.
YH
* yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com [070627 18:58]:
for using xen with LinuxBIOS in Rev F and later: You need to use LinuxBIOS + Kernel + kexec + to load xen.
Why is that? Multiboot?
Can we go the other way round? LinuxBIOS+Xen+DOM0 in the kernel?
Stefan
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 07:37:53PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com [070627 18:58]:
for using xen with LinuxBIOS in Rev F and later: You need to use LinuxBIOS + Kernel + kexec + to load xen.
Why is that? Multiboot?
FILO should do multiboot?
Can we go the other way round? LinuxBIOS+Xen+DOM0 in the kernel?
LB+FILO+xen+dom0, yeah?
//Peter
* Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se [070627 19:54]:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 07:37:53PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com [070627 18:58]:
for using xen with LinuxBIOS in Rev F and later: You need to use LinuxBIOS + Kernel + kexec + to load xen.
Why is that? Multiboot?
FILO should do multiboot?
Unfortunately it does not. Not hard to implement, but I think it is better to wait for grub2.
On 6/27/07, Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de wrote:
- yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com [070627 18:58]:
for using xen with LinuxBIOS in Rev F and later: You need to use LinuxBIOS + Kernel + kexec + to load xen.
Why is that? Multiboot?
Can we go the other way round? LinuxBIOS+Xen+DOM0 in the kernel?
Mulitboot.
and
more guys is using SATA disk instead ot PATA ide.
YH
* yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com [070627 21:40]:
Why is that? Multiboot?
Can we go the other way round? LinuxBIOS+Xen+DOM0 in the kernel?
Mulitboot.
Ok. Grub2 will solve that.
more guys is using SATA disk instead ot PATA ide.
This should not be an issue if we manage to fit Xen and DOM0 into the flash chip.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:44:13PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com [070627 21:40]:
Why is that? Multiboot?
Can we go the other way round? LinuxBIOS+Xen+DOM0 in the kernel?
Mulitboot.
Ok. Grub2 will solve that.
more guys is using SATA disk instead ot PATA ide.
This should not be an issue if we manage to fit Xen and DOM0 into the flash chip.
Anyone willing to try? :) I guess it should be possible with a large enough chip. It's probably best to try to cook up something for QEMU first...
Uwe.
On 7/2/07, Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:44:13PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com [070627 21:40]:
Why is that? Multiboot?
Can we go the other way round? LinuxBIOS+Xen+DOM0 in the kernel?
Mulitboot.
Ok. Grub2 will solve that.
more guys is using SATA disk instead ot PATA ide.
This should not be an issue if we manage to fit Xen and DOM0 into the flash chip.
Anyone willing to try? :) I guess it should be possible with a large enough chip.
I've been waiting for this. Four-socket quad-core (16-way!) with Xen in the Flash part sends chills up my spine. A true virtualization appliance!
-dhbarr.
we're going to put kvm into flash. Xen is really falling out of favor and kvm is winning. This was very clear at OLS as I talked to vendors.
ron
then linuxbios + tiny kernel with kvm could load other os and other linux.
YH
On 7/3/07, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
we're going to put kvm into flash. Xen is really falling out of favor and kvm is winning. This was very clear at OLS as I talked to vendors.
ron
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On 7/3/07, yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com wrote:
then linuxbios + tiny kernel with kvm could load other os and other linux.
yes. Or kvm could *BE* the tiny kernel, with just the right drivers. And, for other drivers, you leave that on disk. There's a lot of options here.
ron