Does any see the following errors? hdc is unusable.
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx CS5530: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 92 CS5530: chipset revision 0 CS5530: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1800-0x1807, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio ide1: BM-DMA at 0x1808-0x180f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio hda: C/H/S=0/0/0 from BIOS ignored hda: LEAD DATA, ATA DISK drive hda: cs5530_set_xfer_mode(PIO 1) hda: set_drive_speed_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } hda: set_drive_speed_status: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError } hdc: SanDisk SDCFB-16, ATA DISK drive hdc: IRQ probe failed (0xfef8) hdc: cs5530_set_xfer_mode(PIO 0) hdc: set_drive_speed_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } hdc: set_drive_speed_status: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError } ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 (serialized with ide0) hda: 64000 sectors (33 MB) w/0KiB Cache, CHS=1000/16/4 hdc: 31360 sectors (16 MB) w/1KiB Cache, CHS=490/2/32 Partition check: hda: hda1 hdc:hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt hdc: lost interrupt [PTBL] [15/32/63] hdc1
-Andrew
IDE problem: If this is a version -a1 or -1 pcm5823 it will not work. Only version -a2 or -2 worked. What version do you have?
Can you double-check that your changes to mainboard.c for this platform were really necessary? I am not convinced.
ron
Ron,
IDE problem: If this is a version -a1 or -1 pcm5823 it will not work. Only version -a2 or -2 worked. What version do you have? Can you double-check that your changes to mainboard.c for this platform were really necessary? I am not convinced.
Mine is pcm-5823-e0a1.
-Andrew
Hi,
I was wondering, why have the kernel patch to force the IDE controller on? Couldn't the same effect be achived by turning on the bits in the appropriate linuxbios southbridge init function?
i.e. avoid the need for a kernel patch?
Kevin
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Kevin Hester wrote:
I was wondering, why have the kernel patch to force the IDE controller on? Couldn't the same effect be achived by turning on the bits in the appropriate linuxbios southbridge init function?
what if you don't need IDE, or turning it on would cause some other trouble.
Anyway, that said, yo uare right; we could do this, and we do on some platforms where linux just can't figure out how to get to IDE.
ron