yeah, I know ... :-)
I just wanted to get the full word in there ....
ron
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:22 PM Aaron Durbin adurbin@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
So we would submit new ACPI table types to the standards guys? Could we
get
names like CORE BOOT CBFS
We just need one table, and we can put whatever we want into it. It's the equivalent of an HPET table, e.g.
?
ron
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM Patrick Georgi via coreboot coreboot@coreboot.org wrote:
2016-04-18 19:09 GMT+02:00 Vadim Bendebury vbendeb@chromium.org:
It's been a while since I looked at it, but why not to pass all information through the coreboot table? (so that just one pointer needs to be shared through ACPI).
One reason for registering these things in ACPI is so that Linux exports them properly via sysfs. /dev/mem is mostly non-functional in newer kernel versions.
Patrick
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
-
ron minnich