On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> So we would submit new ACPI table types to the standards guys? Could we get
> names like
> CORE
> BOOT
> CBFS

We just need one table, and we can put whatever we want into it. It's
the equivalent of an HPET table, e.g.

>
> ?
>
> ron
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM Patrick Georgi via coreboot
> <coreboot@coreboot.org> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-04-18 19:09 GMT+02:00 Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>:
>> > It's been a while since I looked at it, but why not to pass all
>> > information through the coreboot table? (so that just one pointer
>> > needs to be shared through ACPI).
>> One reason for registering these things in ACPI is so that Linux
>> exports them properly via sysfs. /dev/mem is mostly non-functional in
>> newer kernel versions.
>>
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> --
>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot