coreboot July 2015

coreboot@coreboot.org

46 participants
98 discussions

Re: [coreboot] board bringup/debug howto?
by Peter Stuge 02 Jul '15

02 Jul '15

Bill Toner wrote: > options .. for bringup and lowlevel firmware and os driver debug? printf() over the channel of your choice (there are a few) and bus analyzers. //Peter

1 0

board bringup/debug howto?
by Bill Toner 02 Jul '15

02 Jul '15

Amd's embedded developer site suggests the sage smartprobe for jtag debugging a target board. Sage's website shows this is discontinued. Whay other options are there for bringup and lowlevel firmware and os driver debug?

1 0

Re: [coreboot] trouble ahead?
by ron minnich 01 Jul '15

01 Jul '15

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:46 AM <echelon(a)free.fr> wrote: > Depends .. if the big software company mentioned in the FA sees UEFI as > *VERY* strategical for its business, what would be the point to be "nice" > with a project that provides a competing solution of platform > initialisation code?.. > The big company of which you speak has seen UEFI as very strategial for 15 years now ... who cares? I never did. > Now, on the other hand, I'm aware that they contribute to many open source > projects (even to the Linux kernel I heard..) but nevertheless Im a little > bit worried.. > My 2 eurocents (still alive!..) > don't worry, be happy! ron

1 0

Re : Re: trouble ahead?
by echelon＠free.fr 01 Jul '15

01 Jul '15

Depends .. if the big software company mentioned in the FA sees UEFI as *VERY* strategical for its business, what would be the point to be "nice" with a project that provides a competing solution of platform initialisation code?.. Now, on the other hand, I'm aware that they contribute to many open source projects (even to the Linux kernel I heard..) but nevertheless Im a little bit worried.. My 2 eurocents (still alive!..) Florentin ----- Mail d'origine ----- De: ron minnich <rminnich(a)gmail.com> À: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi(a)google.com>, Florentin Demetrescu <echelon(a)free.fr> Cc: Coreboot <coreboot(a)coreboot.org> Envoyé: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Objet: Re: [coreboot] trouble ahead? I can't see that it matters at all. ron

1 0

Re: [coreboot] trouble ahead?
by ron minnich 01 Jul '15

01 Jul '15

I can't see that it matters at all. ron

1 0

Re: [coreboot] trouble ahead?
by Patrick Georgi 01 Jul '15

01 Jul '15

2015-07-01 10:46 GMT+02:00 <echelon(a)free.fr>: > Quite bad news for coreboot isnt it?.... Unlikely. For one, it's one of many rumors (search around, and you'll find that every IT company with a sufficient bank account was "interested" do buy AMD at one point or another). AMD is tons of different business units, and there was ever only one that even acknowledged coreboot. And their existing business case to justify the involvement with coreboot doesn't vanish with a new owner. Patrick -- Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores

1 0

trouble ahead?
by echelon＠free.fr 01 Jul '15

01 Jul '15

Hello, Sorry to fall in catastrophism again, but what do you think about that: http://www.kitguru.net/components/anton-shilov/microsoft-is-interested-to-b… Quite bad news for coreboot isnt it?.... :-/ Florentin

1 0

New on blogs.coreboot.org: [GSoC] coreboot for ARM64 Qemu – Week #4 and #5
by WordPress 01 Jul '15

01 Jul '15

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

coreboot July 2015