Re: Fixes for Tyan s2880

[YhLu]

Eric,

I have made two changes in raminit.c
1. csbase counting
2. fill_last to make sure kernel to scan NUMA successfully.

For s2880 it can work with 4*1G+2*256M RAM, and doesn't work with
4*1G+2*512M or 4*1G+2*1G.

I would try to substitute raminit.c with hardcode one to test for 6G, if it
can help.

Please advise.

Regards

Yinghai Lu

Solo once again

[Stefan Reinauer]

Hi,

does the Solo need any special init for the onboard winbond chip? I
got the solo target to compile again today, but all I get is
reeeaaallyyy slooooow output of the setting up default resources and
node1 before it just hangs.

Stefan

Solo once again

[ron minnich]

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> does the Solo need any special init for the onboard winbond chip? I
> got the solo target to compile again today, but all I get is
> reeeaaallyyy slooooow output of the setting up default resources and
> node1 before it just hangs.

if so, this is a good time to get the newconfig stuff up for solo.

Stefan, I plan to try the new config commands to get your desired topology 
working. I'll let you know.

ron

Solo once again

Stefan Reinauer  writes:
> Hi,
>
> does the Solo need any special init for the onboard winbond chip?

Last I checked the Solo has an undocumented PNC chip.  But
it didn't need anything special to initialize the serial port.
> I
> got the solo target to compile again today, but all I get is
> reeeaaallyyy slooooow output of the setting up default resources and
> node1 before it just hangs.

Hmm.  Is this perhaps running at 9600 baud.

I believe the speed problem is that the XIP defines have not been
picked up in the new configuration stuff.  Anyway that is where I
would look first for speed problems.

There are enough hard codes in the code at the moment that are smp specifc
that we may have a bug there, that can explain the crash.

Eric

Solo once again

[Gregg C Levine]

Hello from Gregg C Levine
Now you've got my curiosity on active. Whose motherboard, is this? Is
it a Tyan job? Where can I get one?
-------------------
Gregg C Levine [e-mail]
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:linuxbios-
> [e-mail]] On Behalf Of Eric W. Biederman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:13 PM
> To: Stefan Reinauer
> Cc: YhLu; [e-mail]; ron minnich;

[e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Solo once again
>
> Stefan Reinauer  writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does the Solo need any special init for the onboard winbond chip?
>
> Last I checked the Solo has an undocumented PNC chip.  But
> it didn't need anything special to initialize the serial port.
> > I
> > got the solo target to compile again today, but all I get is
> > reeeaaallyyy slooooow output of the setting up default resources

and
> > node1 before it just hangs.
>
> Hmm.  Is this perhaps running at 9600 baud.
>
> I believe the speed problem is that the XIP defines have not been
> picked up in the new configuration stuff.  Anyway that is where I
> would look first for speed problems.
>
> There are enough hard codes in the code at the moment that are smp

specifc
> that we may have a bug there, that can explain the crash.
>
> Eric
>
> Linuxbios mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Solo once again

[ron minnich]

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Gregg C Levine wrote:
> Now you've got my curiosity on active. Whose motherboard, is this? Is
> it a Tyan job? Where can I get one?

two current motherboards working that you can buy are the Arima HDAMA and 
the Tyan s2880

ron

Solo once again

[ron minnich]

On 30 Jul 2003, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I believe the speed problem is that the XIP defines have not been
> picked up in the new configuration stuff.  Anyway that is where I
> would look first for speed problems.

oh ho. What XIP defines are needed? I'll put them in but can't test until 
monday.

ron

Solo once again

[Stefan Reinauer]

* Eric W. Biederman  [030731 04:13]:
> Stefan Reinauer  writes:
> > I
> > got the solo target to compile again today, but all I get is
> > reeeaaallyyy slooooow output of the setting up default resources and
> > node1 before it just hangs.
>
> Hmm.  Is this perhaps running at 9600 baud.

Nope, don't think so. I have my terminal program running at 115200bps
and i get text through, always some bytes at once, then it lags, then
some more bytes and so on...
> I believe the speed problem is that the XIP defines have not been
> picked up in the new configuration stuff.  Anyway that is where I
> would look first for speed problems.

This happened with the old config method.
> There are enough hard codes in the code at the moment that are smp specifc
> that we may have a bug there, that can explain the crash.

I basically took the hdama code and stripped it down to fit, but i
might very well have missed something.

Stefan

Fixes for Tyan s2880

YhLu  writes:
> Eric,
>
> I have made two changes in raminit.c
> csbase counting
> fill_last to make sure kernel to scan NUMA successfully.
>
> For s2880 it can work with 4*1G+2*256M RAM, and doesn't work with
> 4*1G+2*512M or 4*1G+2*1G.
>
> I would try to substitute raminit.c with hardcode one to test for 6G, if it
> can help.
>
> Please advise.

There has been enough code churn that my head is still spinning in
trying to get in sync with the main tree.

I have updated raminit.c so that it now handles the case of each
memory controller starting from 0 cleanly, and I have updated
cpufixup.c so that we are handling > 4GB of memory properly.  TOP_MEM2
was not getting set to the proper value.

fill_last was pretty much a duplicate of route_dram_access except
different assumptions were made, so I have removed fill_last again.

If you have memory that doesn't get setup properly now holler.

So we should be pretty close.  Before I can go much farther I need a
test for pre rev c0 cpus.  Because a lot of the remaining memory code
needs to be conditional on it.

I am in the last stages of stabilizing an internal version to
be used in large scale testing to search for hardware
incompatibilities.

I also have a the links width and speed being automatically setup
properly.  But the way I discover the links is still kind of
nasty, so I am not quite ready to push the code back yet.

I should be switching over to the new configuration system on Monday
and once that is sorted out quite I can start putting hard codes
where they belong in the board specific configuration.

Eric

Fixes for Tyan s2880

[ron minnich]

On 31 Jul 2003, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I should be switching over to the new configuration system on Monday
> and once that is sorted out quite I can start putting hard codes
> where they belong in the board specific configuration.

good timing, I'm back then.

Greg has further ideas and we need to keep talking as we converge. I will 
try hard to get the cpu stuff in before monday.

Note that V2 is now supporting PPC and K8. I am going to use the AMD SC520 
for the third architecture test, then it's on to Elan for the fourth.

ron