Hi,
I was about to have a look at implementing UEFI, when I noticed the following:
I understand that I may download and read the UEFI 2.0 specification without the requirement of a license, and doing so creates no obligations or commitments on my part. I further understand and acknowledge that any distribution, additional reproduction, implementation or other use of the specification requires a license, which can be obtained by executing the UEFI Adopters' Agreement.
Reading further, this means I have to pay a yearly (voluntary?) fee to be allowed to do anything with the UEFI spec.
Is there any interest at all in an Open Source UEFI implementation?
This discussion is popping up from time to time but it is never really getting forward yet.
What do you think?
Best regards Stefan Reinauer
I don't know what to do or say.
I will try to get some info from someone and then get back to this list.
ron
What do you think?
IMO, lots of members-only "standards bodies" that should really end in .com instead of .org
is reality ---------------------- uefi.org -> uefi.com vesa.org -> vesa.com iso.org -> iso.com ieee.org -> ieee.com pcisig.com -> ok wikipedia.org -> ok, so far
Maybe start by making a new framework that is similar/compatible but not exactly the same as UEFI. Call it FUefi or something :)
Bryan E. Chafy wrote:
What do you think?
IMO, lots of members-only "standards bodies" that should really end in .com instead of .org
is reality
uefi.org -> uefi.com vesa.org -> vesa.com iso.org -> iso.com ieee.org -> ieee.com pcisig.com -> ok wikipedia.org -> ok, so far
Maybe start by making a new framework that is similar/compatible but not exactly the same as UEFI. Call it FUefi or something :)
I own both openefi.org and free-efi.org
ron
* Bryan E. Chafy bchafy@ccs.neu.edu [060517 17:26]:
Maybe start by making a new framework that is similar/compatible but not exactly the same as UEFI. Call it FUefi or something :)
Been there 12 years ago (actually since the 80ies): Open Firmware and the industry standard IEEE 1275-1994
Stefan