gcc ... -o mptable.o /home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c /home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c:106:22: warning: multi-line string literals are deprecated
I wonder how much code I've seen in the last while (Emacs for example) that uses this one.
I just can't keep up with these improvements. :-)
ron
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 01:55, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
gcc ... -o mptable.o /home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c /home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c:106:22: warning: multi-line string literals are deprecated
I wonder how much code I've seen in the last while (Emacs for example) that uses this one.
which gcc version is it ??
Ollie
On 21 Oct 2002, ollie lho wrote:
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 01:55, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
gcc ... -o mptable.o /home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c /home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c:106:22: warning: multi-line string literals are deprecated
I wonder how much code I've seen in the last while (Emacs for example) that uses this one.
which gcc version is it ??
3.2, the latest greatest that ships with red hat. The API changed too, which caused headaches for bproc etc.
ron
Ronald G Minnich rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
On 21 Oct 2002, ollie lho wrote:
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 01:55, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
gcc ... -o mptable.o
/home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c
/home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c:106:22:
warning: multi-line string literals are deprecated
I wonder how much code I've seen in the last while (Emacs for example) that uses this one.
They are easy enough to fix: "multi-line string" becomes: "multi-line \n" "string"
Which is actually easier to get the indentation correct with.
which gcc version is it ??
3.2, the latest greatest that ships with red hat. The API changed too, which caused headaches for bproc etc.
The API changed, or the ABI changed?
The API should be stable. And only for C++ should the ABI have noticeably changed.
Eric
* Eric W. Biederman ebiederman@lnxi.com [021021 04:55]:
which gcc version is it ??
3.2, the latest greatest that ships with red hat. The API changed too, which caused headaches for bproc etc.
The API changed, or the ABI changed?
The API should be stable. And only for C++ should the ABI have noticeably changed.
it's the C++ ABI that changed. It's likely that this one changes again with the gcc 3.2.1 release :-/
Stefan
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 10:40, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
On 21 Oct 2002, ollie lho wrote:
On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 01:55, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
gcc ... -o mptable.o /home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c /home/rminnich/src/linuxbios-p4dpr-1.0.0.8/freebios/src/mainboard/supermicro/p4dpe/mptable.c:106:22: warning: multi-line string literals are deprecated
I wonder how much code I've seen in the last while (Emacs for example) that uses this one.
which gcc version is it ??
3.2, the latest greatest that ships with red hat. The API changed too, which caused headaches for bproc etc.
I don't have much problem with 3.1 (which only differs form 3.2 by some C++ ABI stuff).
Ollie