Nobody but me cares about the board. I am wondering about making the Dell the pioneer here: remove Options.lb and Config.lb so that it can no longer be built the old way.
Comments?
ron
ron minnich wrote:
Nobody but me cares about the board.
I built an image for someone, maybe a year ago. :)
I am wondering about making the Dell the pioneer here: remove Options.lb and Config.lb so that it can no longer be built the old way.
Comments?
I think that's fine.
//Peter
On Oct 2, 2009, at 2:09, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
Nobody but me cares about the board.
I built an image for someone, maybe a year ago. :)
Did it work?
I am wondering about making the Dell the pioneer here: remove Options.lb and Config.lb so that it can no longer be built the old way.
Comments?
I think that's fine.
//Peter
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
On Oct 2, 2009, at 2:07, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody but me cares about the board. I am wondering about making the Dell the pioneer here: remove Options.lb and Config.lb so that it can no longer be built the old way.
We will remove all Config.lb files once we have moved over to Kconfig.. It's not to be expected that anyone is relying on Config.lb for the Dell since it's broken anyways... So if you promise to fix all Kconfig builds please go ahead and drop Config.lb ... We should refrain from creating a situation where we have to maintain lists for which config method to use... There should be one supported way of doing things for boards at all times...
Stefan
Comments?
ron
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
-
Peter Stuge -
ron minnich -
Stefan Reinauer