Frank wrote:
Just FYI we're working on V2 for the CN400 (Epia-nano).
-Bari
The board looks very attractive for an application I'm thinking about. If I were to go out and buy an Epia board tomorrow, which one should I get if I want to use V2...
Anyone know the status of all the Epia's working with V2?
-Bari
Hi Bari,
Quoting Bari Ari bari@onelabs.com:
Frank wrote:
Just FYI we're working on V2 for the CN400 (Epia-nano).
-Bari
The board looks very attractive for an application I'm thinking about. If I were to go out and buy an Epia board tomorrow, which one should I get if I want to use V2...
Anyone know the status of all the Epia's working with V2?
I have the plain old VIA EPIA (800/5000) working a good 80 % of the time.
Not sure if my problems are buggy northbridge setup or buggy motherboard - it generates some spurious serial at power on, and sometimes hangs reading the smbus to size the ram.
CVS is upto date with my current northbridge code, but not my clean up of the southbridge code.
-Bari
Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
Mark.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using ISPMailNow.com
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 mark.wilkinson@2pmtech.com wrote:
CVS is upto date with my current northbridge code, but not my clean up of the southbridge code.
arg! I thought I had applied this, can you resend.
ron
mark.wilkinson@2pmtech.com writes:
Hi Bari,
I have the plain old VIA EPIA (800/5000) working a good 80 % of the time.
Not sure if my problems are buggy northbridge setup or buggy motherboard - it generates some spurious serial at power on, and sometimes hangs reading the smbus to size the ram.
The spurious serial at power on. (Assuming it is just a character) sounds like normal line noise.
As for smbus they seem to be the most common board problem I have seen. Last time I trace one down it really was a board design defect, and made using lmsensors on that board impossible. In any event it is not terribly hard to put in timeouts and board resets to get past smbus problems.
Although if you are having problems 20% of the time that is much more often then I have seen problems on other boards. Usually I see problems closer to the 1% mark.
Eric
Quoting ebiederman@lnxi.com:
mark.wilkinson@2pmtech.com writes:
Hi Bari,
I have the plain old VIA EPIA (800/5000) working a good 80 % of the time.
Not sure if my problems are buggy northbridge setup or buggy motherboard - it generates some spurious serial at power on, and sometimes hangs reading the smbus to size the ram.
The spurious serial at power on. (Assuming it is just a character) sounds like normal line noise.
Unfortunately not, it's more like a couple of dozen characters, which if the reset button is pressed, come out as text from LB. I'm assuming that the spurious characters are because the serial UART is not setup the first time power is applied, but is still configured when the reset button get's pressed.
As for smbus they seem to be the most common board problem I have seen. Last time I trace one down it really was a board design defect, and made using lmsensors on that board impossible. In any event it is not terribly hard to put in timeouts and board resets to get past smbus problems.
Although if you are having problems 20% of the time that is much more often then I have seen problems on other boards. Usually I see problems closer to the 1% mark.
Eric
The 20% is just an estimate, it could well be more or less than this. I could have been miss lead as to the smbus as well, i'm basing this assumption on the fact it always seems to hang when reading the SDRAM config registers for the first memory bank.
Mark.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using ISPMailNow.com
for our tuturoials we found the EPIAs with linuxbios to boot 100% of the time, and this was several dozen of them.
ron
Quoting "Ronald G. Minnich" rminnich@lanl.gov:
for our tuturoials we found the EPIAs with linuxbios to boot 100% of the time, and this was several dozen of them.
Hmmm, guess this means I have a problem here.... Was that V1 or V2 ? I don't remember having problems with V1 code. What version of gcc etc did you use/are you using ?
ron
Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
Mark.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using ISPMailNow.com
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 mark.wilkinson@2pmtech.com wrote:
Hmmm, guess this means I have a problem here.... Was that V1 or V2 ? I don't remember having problems with V1 code.
Always V2.
What version of gcc etc did you use/are you using ?
whatever is on suse 9.1 ...
gcc version 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux) GNU ld version 2.15.90.0.1.1 20040303 (SuSE Linux)
ron