Hi all
Here is some info on two Via EPIA boards, you can find them here: http://irc.walkyrie.se/coreboot/EPIA_m700/ http://irc.walkyrie.se/coreboot/EPIA_n700/ and some pictures of the boards, which I release to public domain: http://irc.walkyrie.se/coreboot/pictures/
Cheers Jakob.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Jakob Bornecrantzwallbraker@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Here is some info on two Via EPIA boards, you can find them here: http://irc.walkyrie.se/coreboot/EPIA_m700/ http://irc.walkyrie.se/coreboot/EPIA_n700/ and some pictures of the boards, which I release to public domain: http://irc.walkyrie.se/coreboot/pictures/
Here are the files attached as per requested on IRC.
Also I have tested read/write/erase on the m700 board but only read on the n700, not that write/erase failed I just don't have a way to recover bad write on the n700 yet.
Cheers Jakob.
Hi Jakob,
no offense intended, but getpir recently got an update which caused it to print incorrect file headers. The irq_table.c snippet below looks like you used that getpir version and followed the instructions, so I won't blame you. I didn't yet have time (and energy) to revert that change to getpir.
If you got irq_table.c by running getpir, it is most likely not under the GPL and also not your copyright. It might be possible that the results of getpir can be classified as non-copyrightable data, but even then applying the GPL to data someone else created feels wrong. For now, I have to ask you to rerun getpir from revision 4295 which has somewhat different output without bogus license information. Thanks.
If you created irq_table.c from scratch or based your own routing layout on getpir results, please accept my apologies.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On 02.07.2009 00:50, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
/*
This file is part of the coreboot project.
Copyright (C) 2009 Jakob Bornecrantz wallbraker@gmail.com
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
[...] */
#ifdef GETPIR /* TODO: Drop this when copying to coreboot. */ #include "pirq_routing.h" /* TODO: Drop this when copying to coreboot. */ #else /* TODO: Drop this when copying to coreboot. */ #include <arch/pirq_routing.h> #endif /* TODO: Drop this when copying to coreboot. */
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfingerc-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Jakob,
no offense intended, but getpir recently got an update which caused it to print incorrect file headers. The irq_table.c snippet below looks like you used that getpir version and followed the instructions, so I won't blame you. I didn't yet have time (and energy) to revert that change to getpir.
If you got irq_table.c by running getpir, it is most likely not under the GPL and also not your copyright. It might be possible that the results of getpir can be classified as non-copyrightable data, but even then applying the GPL to data someone else created feels wrong. For now, I have to ask you to rerun getpir from revision 4295 which has somewhat different output without bogus license information. Thanks.
Yes it was a broken version I will re run.
If you created irq_table.c from scratch or based your own routing layout on getpir results, please accept my apologies.
No i did not write them myself, I assumed it was okay to add it since mptable adds a copyright automatically, I'm sorry.
Cheers Jakob.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfingerc-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Jakob,
no offense intended, but getpir recently got an update which caused it to print incorrect file headers. The irq_table.c snippet below looks like you used that getpir version and followed the instructions, so I won't blame you. I didn't yet have time (and energy) to revert that change to getpir.
If you got irq_table.c by running getpir, it is most likely not under the GPL and also not your copyright. It might be possible that the results of getpir can be classified as non-copyrightable data, but even then applying the GPL to data someone else created feels wrong. For now, I have to ask you to rerun getpir from revision 4295 which has somewhat different output without bogus license information. Thanks.
Here are the new results from getpir.
Cheers Jakob.
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Jakob Bornecrantz