Re: geminilake fsp on Google Chromebook?

[James Feeney]

Dec 16, 2023 at 20:16 by [e-mail]:
> Just a thought, the FSP headers are pretty small. Maybe they can be compressed and added to the firmware image to make this easier, the way we do for the config file.

Considering that coreboot needs to know these FSP address offsets, that would seem an excellent idea.  Or, at least a reference to the actual version of the headers used could be added to the firmware image, if a unique header version number exists.

I notice that in the documentation, referenced at 3rdparty/fsp/ApolloLakeFspBinPkg/Docs/Apollo_Lake_FSP_Integration_Guide.pdf, Intel mentions Coreboot specifically by name.  So maybe the coreboot developers would hold some sway with this idea.