Re: [coreboot] Kconfig vs. devicetree vs. CMOS policy for options? - coreboot

16 May 2011

      Is there any benefit to actually disabling this stuff?
Mvh Anders
----- Reply message -----
Fra: "Andrew" nitr0@seti.kr.ua
Dato: man., maj 16, 2011 19:02
Emne: [coreboot] Kconfig vs. devicetree vs. CMOS policy for options?
Til: coreboot@coreboot.org
16.05.2011 19:31, Marc Jones пишет:
...

CMOS is not a good place for platform options either. It is good

for runtime options, but I don't think that there are many options for
users to change. What options users would change and how will they
change them? CMOS options could even go into the device tree.
IMHO device operation modes (for ex., AHCI/legacy IDE for SATA, LPT port 
modes, etc) should be in CMOS. Also switches for enabling/disabling 
devices (LPT, FDD, IDE/SATA, etc) should be in CMOS.
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot