Enable v.s. Enabled

[Li-Ta Lo]

Hi,

I changed the device:enable and chip_device_path::enable to
device:enabled and chip_device_path::enabled because they
are acutally verbs describe the status of the devices.
I also change all the affected code I can find, there should
be no problems except you have to re-run the config tool.

Ollie

[Greg Watson]

Was it annoying you or something :-)

Greg

On 29/04/2004, at 2:28 PM, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I changed the device:enable and chip_device_path::enable to
> device:enabled and chip_device_path::enabled because they
> are acutally verbs describe the status of the devices.
> I also change all the affected code I can find, there should
> be no problems except you have to re-run the config tool.
>
> Ollie
>
> Linuxbios mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

[Li-Ta Lo]

On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 17:14, Greg Watson wrote:
> Was it annoying you or something :-)

Yea, I can't tell from the variable name if it is a
function or just a boolean.

Ollie
> Greg
>
> On 29/04/2004, at 2:28 PM, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I changed the device:enable and chip_device_path::enable to
> > device:enabled and chip_device_path::enabled because they
> > are acutally verbs describe the status of the devices.
> > I also change all the affected code I can find, there should
> > be no problems except you have to re-run the config tool.
> >
> > Ollie
> >
> > Linuxbios mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios