[PATCH] __ROMCC__ ifdefs

[Myles Watson]

I think it's time to separate the two meanings of __ROMCC__.  Right now it
is used for:
1. Use simple functions and data types since we don't have RAM
2. Don't use prototypes, romcc doesn't support them.

Right now the patch creates __PRE_RAMINIT__

The name is not the most important part of the patch, and can easily be
changed.

Here are some of the suggestions so far:
__PRE_RAM__
__NO_RAM_YET__
__DURING_RAMINIT__
__USE_NO_RAM__

Unless it was obvious to me which meaning was the correct one for a file, I
added both for now.

Abuild tested.

Signed-off-by: Myles Watson

Thanks,
Myles

[Myles Watson]

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> I think it's time to separate the two meanings of __ROMCC__.  Right now it
> is used for:
> Use simple functions and data types since we don't have RAM
> Don't use prototypes, romcc doesn't support them.
>
> Right now the patch creates __PRE_RAMINIT__
>
> The name is not the most important part of the patch, and can easily be
> changed.
>
> Here are some of the suggestions so far:
> __PRE_RAM__
> __NO_RAM_YET__
> __DURING_RAMINIT__
> __USE_NO_RAM__
>
> Unless it was obvious to me which meaning was the correct one for a file, I
> added both for now.
>
> Abuild tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Myles Watson

Same patch with __PRE_RAM__

Still abuild-tested.

Thanks,
Myles

[Peter Stuge]

Myles Watson wrote:
> > I think it's time to separate the two meanings of __ROMCC__.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson
>
> Same patch with __PRE_RAM__
>
> Still abuild-tested.

Acked-by: Peter Stuge

[Myles Watson]

> Acked-by: Peter Stuge

Rev 4921.

Thanks,
Myles