I've got an elfImage that has a text segment at 800000.
When I run mkelfImage from the latest CVS, the elfImage that is created has that chunk at 800000 moved down to 100000. The segment in elfImage at 100000 has the exact size of the segment at 800000 in the input elf file.
OK, anybody seen anything like this? any hints :-)
ron
ron minnich rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
I've got an elfImage that has a text segment at 800000.
Is this a linux kernel? If not mkelfImage 1.x does not apply.
When I run mkelfImage from the latest CVS, the elfImage that is created has that chunk at 800000 moved down to 100000. The segment in elfImage at 100000 has the exact size of the segment at 800000 in the input elf file.
OK, anybody seen anything like this? any hints :-)
Have you tried the latest mkelfImage from my site.
Sorry for being slow in this sync up I have a nasty cold right now, plus quite a few things are catching up to me that I put off while writing romcc.
Eric
On 11 Apr 2003, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
ron minnich rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
I've got an elfImage that has a text segment at 800000.
Is this a linux kernel? If not mkelfImage 1.x does not apply.
never mind, it was a big mistake on my part.
I was reconstructing last summer's plan9 work and my brain glitched :-)
Sorry if I made your cold worse :-)
ron
ron minnich rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
On 11 Apr 2003, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
ron minnich rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
I've got an elfImage that has a text segment at 800000.
Is this a linux kernel? If not mkelfImage 1.x does not apply.
never mind, it was a big mistake on my part.
I was reconstructing last summer's plan9 work and my brain glitched :-)
Ah. If you can send me a patch for mkelfImage-2.3 I would appreciate it. -t plan9 sounds nice.
Sorry if I made your cold worse :-)
No problem I just figured an explanation was useful.
Eric