Ah, that's what I meant by persistent. Let's take your name and get rid of mine, and we're still at 2 axes?
ron
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:40 PM, David Hendricks dhendrix@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:29 PM, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with david.
Simple classifications are better. I think I found two axes.
persistent
Add to that "always on" versus "boot/resume path".
replacable
persistent and not replaceable --> this system may not be usable non-persistent and not replaceable --> requires a close look
replaceable --> we're ok with enough effort
are there more?
ron
-- David Hendricks (dhendrix) Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.