I personally like this patch, not because I did. It is easy to use and handle. I am gonna signed-off-by it. If I get support, I will check it in.
Zheng
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao zheng.bao@amd.com
________________________________________ From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of She, Kerry Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:12 PM To: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
Sorry to send again, forget the subject last email
I have made a little bit cleanup from the patches originally made by Bao Zheng, This sb800 code is derived from sb700 implementation. Release this patch is NOT to confusing people, but make other patches based on this implementation also works.
So this patch don't need to be checked into the tree.
Regards, Kerry She < kerry.she@amd.com> Tel: 86-10-6280-1415
Hello Bao Zheng,
Thanks for the SB800 work. I would be happy to ack it, but first a couple of questions.
1) How was this SB800 code tested? 2) What about the SB800 portion of the coreboot reference code for Inagua? I think AMD plans to release it soon. Last time I saw that code, it had its own SB800 support.
Thanks, Scott
-----Original Message----- From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Bao, Zheng Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 08:20 PM To: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
I personally like this patch, not because I did. It is easy to use and handle. I am gonna signed-off-by it. If I get support, I will check it in.
Zheng
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao zheng.bao@amd.com
________________________________________ From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of She, Kerry Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:12 PM To: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
Sorry to send again, forget the subject last email
I have made a little bit cleanup from the patches originally made by Bao Zheng, This sb800 code is derived from sb700 implementation. Release this patch is NOT to confusing people, but make other patches based on this implementation also works.
So this patch don't need to be checked into the tree.
Regards, Kerry She < kerry.she@amd.com> Tel: 86-10-6280-1415
Currently the SB800 cimx wrapper code has already been checked in. It and the plain-sb700-derived code are both tested on board Bimini. The sb800 code that support Inagua, i.e. SB800 cimx wrapper code, has already checked in.
It might be a little confusing. Hope I explained it clearly.
Zheng
-----Original Message----- From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Scott Duplichan Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:03 AM To: Bao, Zheng; coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
Hello Bao Zheng,
Thanks for the SB800 work. I would be happy to ack it, but first a couple of questions.
- How was this SB800 code tested?
- What about the SB800 portion of the coreboot reference code for Inagua?
I think AMD plans to release it soon. Last time I saw that code, it had its own SB800 support.
Thanks, Scott
-----Original Message----- From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Bao, Zheng Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 08:20 PM To: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
I personally like this patch, not because I did. It is easy to use and handle. I am gonna signed-off-by it. If I get support, I will check it in.
Zheng
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao zheng.bao@amd.com
From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of She, Kerry Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:12 PM To: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: [coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
Sorry to send again, forget the subject last email
I have made a little bit cleanup from the patches originally made by Bao Zheng, This sb800 code is derived from sb700 implementation. Release this patch is NOT to confusing people, but make other patches based on this implementation also works.
So this patch don't need to be checked into the tree.
Regards, Kerry She < kerry.she@amd.com> Tel: 86-10-6280-1415
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
* Bao, Zheng Zheng.Bao@amd.com [110111 03:19]:
I personally like this patch, not because I did. It is easy to use and handle. I am gonna signed-off-by it. If I get support, I will check it in.
Zheng
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao zheng.bao@amd.com
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer stepan@coreboot.org