Re: [coreboot] [announce] coreboot for the 21st century

[Stefan Reinauer]

* ron minnich  [140320 22:37]:
> I like this, I just wish we could remove more boards :-)

I was surprised that the number of boards still using ROMCC for romstage
was so low. We could also remove the revF and Fam10 boards because the
use non-standardized cache as ram implementation.

Are any boards in particular making progress hard?

Stefan

[announce] coreboot for the 21st century

[ron minnich]

No, I think this is a good first step, and we'll learn a lot in the act of
removing them.

I think if we ever CONFIG_ANNOYING_CHIPSET anything, we remove the chipset
:-)

ron

[announce] coreboot for the 21st century

[Kyösti Mälkki]

On 03/21/2014 12:39 AM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> ron minnich  [140320 22:37]:
> > I like this, I just wish we could remove more boards :-)
>
> I was surprised that the number of boards still using ROMCC for romstage
> was so low. We could also remove the revF and Fam10 boards because the
> use non-standardized cache as ram implementation.
>
> Are any boards in particular making progress hard?
>
> Stefan

I never heard of standardized cache-as-ram implementation.

I assume you mean K8 too (pre-F). I think none of these boards never got 
really _properly_ ported from ROMCC days as they are built by including 
all source files in romstage.c.

Kyösti