On 17.03.2017 18:17, ron minnich wrote:
This one surprised me:
"Get Clang going again - what do we need to do to get it going?"
So, as of a few months ago, after long discussion, the decision as I understood it was to make us GNU11, not C11. I went back and reviewed the discussion, and that was how it seemed to come out.
The decision was to make explicit what was already needed for a long time (already last time Clang was working). Don't worry about Clang, it can digest -std=gnu11 as well [1].
Nico
[1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#differences-between-various-stan...
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:30 AM Nico Huber nico.h@gmx.de wrote:
The decision was to make explicit what was already needed for a long time (already last time Clang was working). Don't worry about Clang, it can digest -std=gnu11 as well [1].
If that works for this project, then I guess that's ok. Harvey, on the other hand, also intends to use the intel compiler (ICC). -std=gnu11 is not an option we would ever use.
thanks ron