-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
After figuring out that the makefile for flashrom is really simple, I got the static build that I needed. Once on the system that I got to boot in a round about way, I got the output below.
<snip> - -bash-3.00# ./flashrom flashrom v0.9.0-r535 coreboot table found at 0x500. Vendor ID: Intel, part ID: SE7520JR22D Found chipset "Intel ICH5/ICH5R", enabling flash write... OK.
Unknown vendor:board from coreboot table or -m option: Intel:SE7520JR22D
Calibrating delay loop... OK. No EEPROM/flash device found. If you know which flash chip you have, and if this version of flashrom supports a similar flash chip, you can try to force read your chip. Run: flashrom -f -r -c similar_supported_flash_chip filename
Note: flashrom can never write when the flash chip isn't found automatically. </snip>
I am going to read the documentation, as I have been, but does this mean that I am dead in the water? The only way that linux bios could even be on these nodes is through the use of LBFLASH, which if I understand correctly is pre flashrom.
Thanks,
Joshua
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:17:37AM -0500, Joshua McDowell wrote:
- -bash-3.00# ./flashrom
flashrom v0.9.0-r535 coreboot table found at 0x500. Vendor ID: Intel, part ID: SE7520JR22D Found chipset "Intel ICH5/ICH5R", enabling flash write... OK.
Unknown vendor:board from coreboot table or -m option: Intel:SE7520JR22D
Calibrating delay loop... OK. No EEPROM/flash device found. If you know which flash chip you have, and if this version of flashrom supports a similar flash chip, you can try to force read your chip. Run: flashrom -f -r -c similar_supported_flash_chip filename
Note: flashrom can never write when the flash chip isn't found automatically.
Please post the output of 'flashrom -V', maybe we can fix this. Can you look on the board which chip exactly you have (vendor and part name)?
Uwe.
On 20.05.2009 18:17, Joshua McDowell wrote:
I am going to read the documentation, as I have been, but does this mean that I am dead in the water? The only way that linux bios could even be on these nodes is through the use of LBFLASH, which if I understand correctly is pre flashrom.
It would be interesting to have a look at LBFLASH. Do you have a pointer to the sources?
Regards, Carl-Daniel
I have the sources, would u like me to send them somewhere?
Joshua McDowell - Lead integrator
Sent from my Blackberry
-----Original Message----- From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:12:05 To: Joshua McDowelljmcdowell@issisolutions.com Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] I figured out the static problem.. But..
On 20.05.2009 18:17, Joshua McDowell wrote:
I am going to read the documentation, as I have been, but does this mean that I am dead in the water? The only way that linux bios could even be on these nodes is through the use of LBFLASH, which if I understand correctly is pre flashrom.
It would be interesting to have a look at LBFLASH. Do you have a pointer to the sources?
Regards, Carl-Daniel
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
it's not that LBFLASH is pre-flashrom, they were parallel developments.
ron
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Joshua McDowell -
Joshua McDowell
-
ron minnich -
Uwe Hermann