On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:24:39PM -0700, David Hendricks wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
Paul Menzel wrote:
opening that URL I see that Sven uploaded a second iteration.
I think I would like to get later iterations in follow-up emails..
Yep, me too.
If you add yourself as a reviewer, you should get e-mails for comments and iterations.
(Note: I haven't verified this with Coreboot's gerrit setup)
I'd prefer to see all changes for all issues on the mailing list, I don't think I want to go to the web interface for every new patch submission someone does and add myself there just in order to get the notifications.
Uwe.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:24:39PM -0700, David Hendricks wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
Paul Menzel wrote:
opening that URL I see that Sven uploaded a second iteration.
I think I would like to get later iterations in follow-up emails..
Yep, me too.
Maybe I was over-reacting to what seemed like a lot of "Patch set updated" e-mails drowning out ML discussion.
Perhaps it would be wise to create another e-mail list for verbose gerrit messages? That could satisfy the needs of the more involved developers, without creating too much traffic on the main discussion mailing list.
I don't think I want to go to the web interface for every new patch
submission someone does and add myself there just in order to get the notifications.
FWIW, the sender can add people to the reviewer list from the CLI when sending the patch. For example, if you and Patrick are discussing an issue and you whip out a patch, then it's perfectly kosher for you to upload the patch with Patrick listed as a reviewer so he automatically gets further updates and comments.
The gerrit FAQ linked from the coreboot page uses this as an example: Specific reviewers can be requested and/or additional `carbon copies'' of the notification message may be sent by including these as arguments to `git receive-pack: git push --receive-pack='git receive-pack --reviewer=a@a.com --cc=b@o.com' tr:kernel/common HEAD:refs/for/experimental
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 18:39 +0200 schrieb Uwe Hermann:
I'd prefer to see all changes for all issues on the mailing list, I don't think I want to go to the web interface for every new patch submission someone does and add myself there just in order to get the notifications.
Back again.
Patrick
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Patrick Georgi patrick@georgi-clan.dewrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 18:39 +0200 schrieb Uwe Hermann:
I'd prefer to see all changes for all issues on the mailing list, I don't think I want to go to the web interface for every new patch submission someone does and add myself there just in order to get the notifications.
Back again.
Is there an option to keep all these related updates and merges in a single thread, ie do not display the patch's hash in the subject: line? Shortly after patch update notifications to the list were re-enabled, three updates to "i945 GMA: restore tft brightness from cmos" spawned three different threads within the span of 10 minutes. It has the same effect on my gmail inbox as it does on the mailing list archive.