So you make the romcc to support the real function instead of all inline...?
YH
-----Original Message----- From: ebiederman@lnxi.com [mailto:ebiederman@lnxi.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 10:20 PM To: LinuxBIOS Subject: [LinuxBIOS] FYI: AMD support for cache as ram.
Check out the new BIOS and Kernel Developers Guide.
Eric
LinuxBIOS mailing list LinuxBIOS@openbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:04 -0700, YhLu wrote:
So you make the romcc to support the real function instead of all inline...?
With cache as ram, we don't need romcc, everything can be compiled by GCC.
YH
-----Original Message----- From: ebiederman@lnxi.com [mailto:ebiederman@lnxi.com] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 10:20 PM To: LinuxBIOS Subject: [LinuxBIOS] FYI: AMD support for cache as ram.
Check out the new BIOS and Kernel Developers Guide.
Eric
LinuxBIOS mailing list LinuxBIOS@openbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
LinuxBIOS mailing list LinuxBIOS@openbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:05:14AM -0600, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:04 -0700, YhLu wrote:
So you make the romcc to support the real function instead of all inline...?
With cache as ram, we don't need romcc, everything can be compiled by GCC.
The AMD docs don't mention a chip revision - does this mean the trick will work for all Athlon64 and Opterons?
-Kevin