AGP support looks like it is just a placeholder. Is there any reason we shouldn't just have it use default pci ops? The only thing it does now is find the AGP capability. There's a comment that says that the OS is responsible for AGP tuning.
Thanks, Myles
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
AGP support looks like it is just a placeholder. Is there any reason we shouldn't just have it use default pci ops? The only thing it does now is find the AGP capability. There's a comment that says that the OS is responsible for AGP tuning.
no reason I know of. AGP is pretty much dead anyway, right? Do any boards we care about in v3 use AGP?
ron
ron minnich wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
AGP support looks like it is just a placeholder. Is there any reason we shouldn't just have it use default pci ops? The only thing it does now is find the AGP capability. There's a comment that says that the OS is responsible for AGP tuning.
no reason I know of. AGP is pretty much dead anyway, right? Do any boards we care about in v3 use AGP?
The VIA vx800 and cx700 integrated graphics are on internal AGP. Will this be an issue for them (if and when the patches ever make it public)?
-Bari
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:43 AM, bari bari@onelabs.com wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
AGP support looks like it is just a placeholder. Is there any reason we shouldn't just have it use default pci ops? The only thing it does now is find the AGP capability. There's a comment that says that the OS is responsible for AGP tuning.
no reason I know of. AGP is pretty much dead anyway, right? Do any boards we care about in v3 use AGP?
The VIA vx800 and cx700 integrated graphics are on internal AGP. Will this be an issue for them (if and when the patches ever make it public)?
Will they use the default AGP driver? If so it will make it so they use the default PCI driver instead.
Thanks, Myles