Re: FYI: Merge in progress...

"Yinghai Lu"  writes:
> So chip tree is merged into device tree.

Yep.
> I'm eager to convert my MB to use that.
>
> Is there any problem for different inherent links in second K8?

Not in theory.  In practice I think this is the one case that has not yet
been fixed in config.g for generation of static.c.

I will take a quick look.

Eric

FYI: Merge in progress...

[e-mail] (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> "Yinghai Lu"  writes:
> > So chip tree is merged into device tree.
>
> Yep.
> > I'm eager to convert my MB to use that.
> >
> > Is there any problem for different inherent links in second K8?

Not anymore.  I just worked through that case in config.g and cleaned up that
whole area of code.  Everything looks good at this point.

Eric

FYI: Merge in progress...

[Yinghai Lu]

Great, I will test that Monday. The code can be complied for s2885 and
s2895.

Regards

Yinghai Lu

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric W. Biederman [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Eric W.
Biederman
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 1:06 PM
To: Yinghai Lu
Cc: 'Ronald G. Minnich'; 'LinuxBIOS'
Subject: Re: FYI: Merge in progress...

[e-mail] (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> "Yinghai Lu"  writes:
> > So chip tree is merged into device tree.
>
> Yep.
> > I'm eager to convert my MB to use that.
> >
> > Is there any problem for different inherent links in second K8?

Not anymore.  I just worked through that case in config.g and cleaned up
that
whole area of code.  Everything looks good at this point.

Eric