Hi Lance,
On 11/6/18 11:39 PM, Lance Zhao wrote:
Yes, I believe we should let mainboard to select CAR implementation instead of force selection in soc Kconfig. I will suggest to remove that line.
having a `select` for the CAR implementation is not what I had in mind but definitely something we can discuss. The current situation is _not_ that the SoC selects it, but rather that the SoC offers a choice with questionable defaults and possible settings that don't even compile.
So, if we'd want to set the CAR implementation in stone per mainboard, I think we should discuss first, how to decide (as a developer that adds a mainboard) what to choose. And there is the problem: I myself don't see a choice and would always take the open-source implementation.
Take FSP2.0 for instance, most SoCs currently offer a choice between:
o "Enhanced Non-evict mode" o "Use FSP CAR"
While I can find many arguments to select the former, I can't find any for the latter. Can you help me there?
Nico
PS. I presume that both options technically offer the same feature. Is there something I'm missing?
-
Nico Huber