Sone,
You may add the zelf make option as Etherboot to make payload smaller.
YH.
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: Takeshi Sone [mailto:ts1@tsn.or.jp] 发送时间: 2004年4月5日 2:40 收件人: ebiederman@lnxi.com 抄送: linuxbios@clustermatic.org 主题: Re: FILO 0.4 [PMX:#]
Eric, Sorry for not replying soon. I've been busy with real job and life, config file support is not yet written, though I'm still willing to do it (+ USB support etc..) This situation would not seem to change in a month or two..
-----Original Message----- From: ebiederman@lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman) Sent: 04 Apr 2004 21:10:51 -0600 To: ron minnich rminnich@lanl.gov Subject: Re: FILO 0.4 [PMX:#]
ron minnich rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Yinghai Lu wrote:
I have checked the Etherboot, and it would be some easier to integrate
filo
into Etherboot.
Not everyone here at LANL is that satisfied with etherboot, and in fact
we
are moving over to FILO. There are a lot of reasons. We've just had
lots
better luck with FILO when all things are considered.
Ron, is LANL going to maintain FILO then?
Unless I hear from SONE soon it is starting to look like like FILO is unmaintained.
Has any one implemented config files? Has any one implemented listing of files?
What do you do when you don't have a disk?
Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
___________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list Linuxbios@clustermatic.org http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
-
YhLu