You take the time to write an entire o/s in Assembly. :-)
-- Roger http://www.eskimo.com/~roger/index.html Key fingerprint = 8977 A252 2623 F567 70CD 1261 640F C963 1005 1D61
Fri Apr 20 13:14:21 PDT 2007
roger wrote:
You take the time to write an entire o/s in Assembly. :-)
No, that's actually somewhat useful. Now this:
http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/tiny/teensy.html
is crazy.
-Corey
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:45:42PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote:
roger wrote:
You take the time to write an entire o/s in Assembly. :-)
No, that's actually somewhat useful. Now this:
http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/tiny/teensy.html
is crazy.
The extremes aren't very useful, overloading structures with code is not a good idea. I would guess virus scanners and who knows who else will have objectins, even if the kernel is happy.
Assembly can be good though; more than once have I used asmutils when doing tricks with libraries so that no C programs ran.
http://asm.sourceforge.net/asmutils.html
//Peter
* roger roger@eskimo.com [070420 22:14]:
You take the time to write an entire o/s in Assembly. :-)
Its nice, but only the old cruft is open sourced. The new and interesting 64bit stuff is not. Well, it's a nice vintage demo, at least.