-----Original Message----- From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of svn@coreboot.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:26 PM To: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: [coreboot] r3762 - trunk/coreboot-v2/src/mainboard/tyan/s2895
Author: stepan Date: 2008-11-20 20:26:16 +0100 (Thu, 20 Nov 2008) New Revision: 3762
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/src/mainboard/tyan/s2895/cache_as_ram_auto.c Log: OK, people, watch this.
This is a school book example of why trivial indent patches just suck big time.
This error was introduced by a trivial self-acked indent patch and was never detected (because of a missing Config-abuild.lb)
So, indenting the code for no reason can make it a lot worse (read: break it) instead of improving it.
I ask everyone to keep this in mind when going on indent-frenzy again.
Guilty. I apologize.
Thanks, Myles
Myles Watson wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org] On Behalf Of svn@coreboot.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:26 PM To: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: [coreboot] r3762 - trunk/coreboot-v2/src/mainboard/tyan/s2895
Author: stepan Date: 2008-11-20 20:26:16 +0100 (Thu, 20 Nov 2008) New Revision: 3762
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/src/mainboard/tyan/s2895/cache_as_ram_auto.c Log: OK, people, watch this.
This is a school book example of why trivial indent patches just suck big time.
This error was introduced by a trivial self-acked indent patch and was never detected (because of a missing Config-abuild.lb)
So, indenting the code for no reason can make it a lot worse (read: break it) instead of improving it.
I ask everyone to keep this in mind when going on indent-frenzy again.
Guilty. I apologize.
;-) You have to break an egg to make an omelet.
I checked in a Config-abuild.lb that would expose such a breakage now.
All the best,
Stefan