[PATCH] Add license headers for AMD family Fh

[Alex G.]

See patch.

Alex

[Stefan Reinauer]

* Alex G.  [110202 20:23]:
> Add GPL license headers to all files in src/cpu/amd/model_fxx
> (except microcode).
> Signed-off-by Alexandru Gagniuc 
> Acked-by Alexandru Gagniuc  Trivial

Not trivial at all, but legally kind of troublesome. Got to NACK this,
sorry.
> +# Copyright (C) The coreboot project

We can not accept generic copyright to the coreboot project, as it is
not a legal entity.
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> +# (at your option) any later version.

coreboot is GPLv2, not GPLv2+

Stefan

[Alex G.]

> Not trivial at all, but legally kind of troublesome. Got to NACK this,
> sorry.

No problem
> coreboot is GPLv2, not GPLv2+

http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines says GPLv2+.
So which is the correct license?

Alex

[Patrick Georgi]

Am 02.02.2011 20:39, schrieb Alex G.:
> > coreboot is GPLv2, not GPLv2+
>
> http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines says GPLv2+.
> So which is the correct license?

We have some GPLv2 and some GPLv2+ files, so the combined work is GPLv2.
As for the files that you added licensing information to, the licensing
is really a matter of the authors.
The only license we can safely apply is the GPLv2.

Patrick

[Alex G.]

On 02/02/2011 09:50 PM, Patrick Georgi wrote:
> Am 02.02.2011 20:39, schrieb Alex G.:
> > > coreboot is GPLv2, not GPLv2+
> >
> > http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines says GPLv2+.
> > So which is the correct license?
>
> We have some GPLv2 and some GPLv2+ files, so the combined work is GPLv2.
> As for the files that you added licensing information to, the licensing
> is really a matter of the authors.
> The only license we can safely apply is the GPLv2.

Thanks! That sheds some light on the matter. :)

Alex