On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
svn@coreboot.org wrote:
- bool "S1850"
Is this a PowerEdge S1850 ?
yes.
ron
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 08:41:01PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
svn@coreboot.org wrote:
- bool "S1850"
Is this a PowerEdge S1850 ?
yes.
OK, changed to "Dell PowerEdge 1850" (without "S") in the code and in the wiki, according to this:
http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/pe1850/en/index.htm
Why is the port/directory named S1850 instead of 1850 though? Just to have a letter as first character, or is the board _actually_ called "S1850"? If so, do you have a more correct vendor website we can link to?
Also, please check http://www.coreboot.org/Supported_Motherboards#Motherboards_supported_in_cor...
Are the entries there correct? I.e. Intel Xeon CPUs, Socket 604? Do you know what kind of chips they use (PLCC or DIP32 or ...) and if it's Parallel/LPC/FWH/SPI?
Thanks, Uwe.
Dear list,
Am Freitag, den 02.10.2009, 14:50 +0200 schrieb Uwe Hermann:
[…]
OK, changed to "Dell PowerEdge 1850" (without "S") in the code
This was r4709.
[…]
Thanks,
Paul
Uwe Hermann wrote:
Do you know what kind of chips they use (PLCC or DIP32 or ...) and if it's Parallel/LPC/FWH/SPI?
Most if not all Dell servers have TSOP flash, I bet it's an Intel FWH part.
//Peter
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
Why is the port/directory named S1850 instead of 1850 though? Just to have a letter as first character, or is the board _actually_ called "S1850"? If so, do you have a more correct vendor website we can link to?
It say s1850 on the front I think.
I'll try to find the other info.
ron
ron minnich wrote:
Why is the port/directory named S1850 instead of 1850 though? Just to have a letter as first character, or is the board _actually_ called "S1850"? If so, do you have a more correct vendor website we can link to?
It say s1850 on the front I think.
This one?
http://gtk.no/images/bim/server/bim2.jpg
It could simply be that the board name can't be all numbers. I don't know if we actually have that restriction?
//Peter
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
This one?
not that one. Interesting.
It could simply be that the board name can't be all numbers. I don't know if we actually have that restriction?
since we generate identifiers from the names, it's always a danger, and might have been an issue in v1. In any case I've gotten into the habit.
ron
Peter Stuge wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
Why is the port/directory named S1850 instead of 1850 though? Just to have a letter as first character, or is the board _actually_ called "S1850"? If so, do you have a more correct vendor website we can link to?
It say s1850 on the front I think.
This one?
http://gtk.no/images/bim/server/bim2.jpg
It could simply be that the board name can't be all numbers. I don't know if we actually have that restriction?
what about renaming it to pe1850?
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 05:50:22PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
This one?
http://gtk.no/images/bim/server/bim2.jpg
It could simply be that the board name can't be all numbers. I don't know if we actually have that restriction?
what about renaming it to pe1850?
Or poweredge_1850 if we're going to rename, so dirnames match the actual board name.
Uwe.
Uwe Hermann wrote:
what about renaming it to pe1850?
Or poweredge_1850 if we're going to rename, so dirnames match the actual board name.
pe is a quite familiar abbreviation for Dell servers, I'd prefer that. But Ron said it's not the same machine as on the picture - we should find out what's going on there before changing the name..
And maybe the mainboard actually does have a name/code, PE is the server product, I don't know if Dell usually name their boards independently. I don't think so.
//Peter
actually it's all meaningless in a sense. We have ten 1850s that have utterly different motherboards than the other 128. They can't even properly netboot as the other 128 do. They all look the same outside.
Vendor names on the outside tell you nothing about the inside.
ron
ron minnich wrote:
actually it's all meaningless in a sense. We have ten 1850s that have utterly different motherboards than the other 128. They can't even properly netboot as the other 128 do. They all look the same outside.
Ok, then it would be nice to find out more about the actual boards inside. Thinking of this I remember one customer getting some systems with different onboard NICs, although it was the very same server model.
Vendor names on the outside tell you nothing about the inside.
As always, very true.
//Peter