Re [PATCH] SECC Pentium 2/3 users are gonna love this

Just fund a Celeron coppermine (686), The chipset of the mainboard seams to be mostly supported so shouldn't take to long to port and test. L2 is 128kb.

Mvh Anders

----- Reply message -----
Fra: "Keith Hui" 
Dato: fre., maj 14, 2010 05:30
Emne: [coreboot] [PATCH] SECC Pentium 2/3 users are gonna love this
Til: "Joseph Smith" 
Cc:

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Joseph Smith  wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 10:03 PM, Keith Hui wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is it. The 72oz steak. ;-) It is ~180k seasoned with a few other
> > related changes (below), so it is gzipped. I may have committed a few
> > "crimes" here, but anyway...
> >
> > First, I found out why the debug output isn't correct - A typo caused
> > the cache size to got lost amid the shuffle. It has been fixed in this
> > version.
> >
> > This patch:
> > Brings back L2 initialization from coreboot v1 for family 63x,65x
> >
> > and 67x CPUs. Need someone with a Mendocino Celeron to see if the
> > entire 128k of L2 is still enabled.
> > 2. Split model_67x/65x and model_63x from model_6xx. model_67x also
> > serves model 65x because they share too much code. Also included are
> > Intel microcode for all CPUs in these families. There's just one file
> > for all microcodes in one family.
> > 3. In Slot 1 Makefile.inc, conditionally bring in sources in models
> > 63x/67x/6bx only when the proper config has been selected in Kconfig.
> > Also, only include cache_as_ram.inc if USE_DCACHE_RAM (ie. CAR) has
> > been selected.
> > 4. Remove USE_DCACHE_RAM from Slot 1 Kconfig. They should be in the
> > mainboards. Add CPU_INTEL_MODEL_6xX Kconfigs needed for (3) above.
> > 5. Blocked out some apparently unused #includes from model_6xx_init.c.
> > Once we're sure nothing really are using it, then remove them.
> >
> > Bootlog with a PIII 600MHz can be found here:
> > http://coreboot.pastebin.com/PNUzJXZT
> >
> > Have fun, bon appetit and cheers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Keith Hui
>
> This looks awesome Keith! Great Work :-)
> I can only see one thing that needs fixing and it is cosmetic:
>
> Lines 394-395 of bootlog look good:
>
> CPU: vendor Intel device 673
> CPU: family 06, model 07, stepping 03
>
> But, Line 411 of bootlog:  CPU: .
> /* Print processor name */
> fill_processor_name(processor_name);
> printk(BIOS_INFO, "CPU: %s.\n", processor_name);
>
> Is the %s not working?

I think that's because Katmai doesn't support processor brand string
through CPUID. See page 3-197, volume 2A, Intel Software Developer's
Manual

It's cosmetic. This code can be removed from model 63x and 67x in the
next patch.

Thanks
Keith