On 26.11.2008 20:46, svn@coreboot.org wrote:
Author: ward Date: 2008-11-26 20:46:27 +0100 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008) New Revision: 3772
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/targets/emulation/qemu-x86/Config.lb Log:
Increase the qemu rom size (non-LAB) to 512KB so that grub2 fits.
This is a trivial patch.
IIRC older Qemu versions can't handle ROMs of that size. I could be wrong, though.
Signed-off-by: Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org Acked-by: Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:04:15PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 26.11.2008 20:46, svn@coreboot.org wrote:
Author: ward Date: 2008-11-26 20:46:27 +0100 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008) New Revision: 3772
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/targets/emulation/qemu-x86/Config.lb Log:
Increase the qemu rom size (non-LAB) to 512KB so that grub2 fits.
This is a trivial patch.
IIRC older Qemu versions can't handle ROMs of that size. I could be wrong, though.
Hmm, the qemu changelog (http://bellard.org/qemu/changelog.html) doesn't say anything about that. I've certainly never seen that problem on 0.9.x. Anyone run into this?
Thanks, Ward.
On 27.11.2008 17:53, Ward Vandewege wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:04:15PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 26.11.2008 20:46, svn@coreboot.org wrote:
Author: ward Date: 2008-11-26 20:46:27 +0100 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008) New Revision: 3772
Modified: trunk/coreboot-v2/targets/emulation/qemu-x86/Config.lb Log:
Increase the qemu rom size (non-LAB) to 512KB so that grub2 fits.
This is a trivial patch.
IIRC older Qemu versions can't handle ROMs of that size. I could be wrong, though.
Hmm, the qemu changelog (http://bellard.org/qemu/changelog.html) doesn't say anything about that. I've certainly never seen that problem on 0.9.x. Anyone run into this?
http://www.coreboot.org/QEMU_Build_Tutorial#Building_or_finding_a_Linux_kern... says this: [...]ensuring that the final coreboot image does not exceed QEMU's BIOS size limit (2MB if qemu-bios-size patch applied, 256KB otherwise).
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org wrote:
Hmm, the qemu changelog (http://bellard.org/qemu/changelog.html) doesn't say anything about that. I've certainly never seen that problem on 0.9.x. Anyone run into this?
yes, I have.
I also can't remember what Bochs will do.
ron