On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:47:31PM +0200, svn@openbios.org wrote:
Name: svn:externals
- flashrom svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom
Do we want a completely new repo for utils?
//Peter
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:57:34PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:47:31PM +0200, svn@openbios.org wrote:
Name: svn:externals
- flashrom svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom
Do we want a completely new repo for utils?
No, I don't think so. On the contrary, we want to have LinuxBIOSv3 in the same repo, too.
Thus:
- trunk - LinuxBIOSv1 - LinuxBIOSv2 - LinuxBIOSv3 - util - flashrom - ...
The advantage is that all moves are easy and retain the history, and also that we can use one and the same trac instance to track bugs and feature requests of _all_ our code, plus common svn code browsers etc, etc.
Uwe.
* Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se [070701 23:57]:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:47:31PM +0200, svn@openbios.org wrote:
Name: svn:externals
- flashrom svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom
Do we want a completely new repo for utils?
Yes we do.
On 02/07/07 00:34 +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se [070701 23:57]:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:47:31PM +0200, svn@openbios.org wrote:
Name: svn:externals
- flashrom svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom
Do we want a completely new repo for utils?
Yes we do.
I would like to see LAR in there too - it would be very handy to be able to build LAR without the whole LBv3 tree, especially for buildrom (/me laughs evilly).
Jordan
* Jordan Crouse jordan.crouse@amd.com [070702 17:24]:
On 02/07/07 00:34 +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se [070701 23:57]:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:47:31PM +0200, svn@openbios.org wrote:
Name: svn:externals
- flashrom svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom
Do we want a completely new repo for utils?
Yes we do.
I would like to see LAR in there too - it would be very handy to be able to build LAR without the whole LBv3 tree, especially for buildrom (/me laughs evilly).
Hm. What do you use it for, if not with v3? ;-)
But I agree it should go to the util dir/repo/...