Dear coreboot readers!
This is the automated build check service of coreboot.
The developer "rminnich" checked in revision 3630 to the coreboot source repository and caused the following changes:
Change Log: This is so that people can see it. This is the sb600 for v3. It almost certainly won't build -- that comes later. I am hoping to get some eyeballs on it for simple errors.
rs690 is next.
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com
Build Log: Compilation of amd:dbm690t has been broken See the error log at http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=3630&device=dbm690t&... Compilation of jetway:j7f24 is still broken See the error log at http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=3630&device=j7f24&v... Compilation of via:epia-cn is still broken See the error log at http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=3630&device=epia-cn&...
If something broke during this checkin please be a pain in rminnich's neck until the issue is fixed.
If this issue is not fixed within 24h the revision should be backed out.
Best regards, coreboot automatic build system
Hi Ron,
you accidentially committed the SB600 v3 stuff into the v2 tree. Do you want to revert or should I take care of that?
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On 02.10.2008 18:21, coreboot information wrote:
The developer "rminnich" checked in revision 3630 to the coreboot source repository and caused the following changes:
Change Log: This is so that people can see it. This is the sb600 for v3. It almost certainly won't build -- that comes later. I am hoping to get some eyeballs on it for simple errors.
rs690 is next.
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com
Build Log: Compilation of amd:dbm690t has been broken See the error log at http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=3630&device=dbm690t&...
Ron and Carl-Daniel,
How are we fixing this? v2 is broken right now.
Marc
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Hi Ron,
you accidentially committed the SB600 v3 stuff into the v2 tree. Do you want to revert or should I take care of that?
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On 02.10.2008 18:21, coreboot information wrote:
The developer "rminnich" checked in revision 3630 to the coreboot source repository and caused the following changes:
Change Log: This is so that people can see it. This is the sb600 for v3. It almost certainly won't build -- that comes later. I am hoping to get some eyeballs on it for simple errors.
rs690 is next.
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com
Build Log: Compilation of amd:dbm690t has been broken See the error log at http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=3630&device=dbm690t&...
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Marc Jones Marc.Jones@amd.com wrote:
Ron and Carl-Daniel,
How are we fixing this? v2 is broken right now.
do you want to pick up my mess? I don't trust myself at present.
ron
ron minnich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Marc Jones Marc.Jones@amd.com wrote:
Ron and Carl-Daniel,
How are we fixing this? v2 is broken right now.
do you want to pick up my mess? I don't trust myself at present.
ron
Ok, I'm working on it. I should have it fixed up soon....
Marc
On 04.10.2008 00:46, ron minnich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Marc Jones Marc.Jones@amd.com wrote:
Ron and Carl-Daniel,
How are we fixing this? v2 is broken right now.
do you want to pick up my mess? I don't trust myself at present.
I'd gladly leave that task to someone with better svn skills than mine. Doing a revert in a way that sort of undoes history is rather difficult. I believe you can do it by telling svn to copy from the old pre-change revision of the file.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 04.10.2008 00:46, ron minnich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Marc Jones Marc.Jones@amd.com wrote:
Ron and Carl-Daniel,
How are we fixing this? v2 is broken right now.
do you want to pick up my mess? I don't trust myself at present.
I'd gladly leave that task to someone with better svn skills than mine. Doing a revert in a way that sort of undoes history is rather difficult. I believe you can do it by telling svn to copy from the old pre-change revision of the file.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
I wasn't going to undo the history. I am not that skilled. I was just going commit on top of that change.
Marc
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Marc Jones Marc.Jones@amd.com wrote:
I wasn't going to undo the history. I am not that skilled. I was just going commit on top of that change.
commit over the change with the comment "Ron owes me big time"
ron
ron minnich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Marc Jones Marc.Jones@amd.com wrote:
I wasn't going to undo the history. I am not that skilled. I was just going commit on top of that change.
commit over the change with the comment "Ron owes me big time"
I expect beer next time I see you ;)
r3636
Thanks, Marc
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Ron,
you accidentially committed the SB600 v3 stuff into the v2 tree. Do you want to revert or should I take care of that?
revert. My apologies. I accidentally picked up the .svn from v2 and so I committed to the v2 tree.
That was dumb ...
ron
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
coreboot information -
Marc Jones -
ron minnich