Hello,
I'm trying to use the ticket system in trac, but keep being rejected as a spammer: "500 Internal Server Error (Submission rejected as potential spam)"
Anyway, what I wanted to report is that Coreboot requires changes to compile on BSD (in my case NetBSD). What I wanted to get committed so far is quite trivial actually: recursive "make" calls should be changed to "$(MAKE)", as GNU make (or "gmake") is apparently necessary to build.
The attached patch is for ADLO, but the generic build system would need to be fixed as well.
HTH,
Pierre Pronchery wrote:
The attached patch is for ADLO, but the generic build system would need to be fixed as well.
See attached patch.
HTH,
Pierre Pronchery wrote:
The attached patch is for ADLO, but the generic build system would need to be fixed as well.
Some more trivial Makefile cleanup.
HTH,
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2008-05-29 kell 13:10, kirjutas Pierre Pronchery:
Pierre Pronchery wrote:
The attached patch is for ADLO, but the generic build system would need to be fixed as well.
Some more trivial Makefile cleanup.
Please repost all your patches with Signed-off-by declaration as per http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines#Sign-off_Procedure
Regards, Mart Raudsepp Artec Design LLC
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:48:26AM +0200, Pierre Pronchery wrote:
Hello,I'm trying to use the ticket system in trac, but keep being rejected as a spammer: "500 Internal Server Error (Submission rejected as potential spam)"
Anyway, what I wanted to report is that Coreboot requires changes to compile on BSD (in my case NetBSD). What I wanted to get committed so
Ooooh, spiffy. I guess this means I have a bit more motivation then. More on this later.
far is quite trivial actually: recursive "make" calls should be changed to "$(MAKE)", as GNU make (or "gmake") is apparently necessary to build.
Yeah, for coreboot itself there are just a few lines that need patching to build on NetBSD/i386
The attached patch is for ADLO, but the generic build system would need to be fixed as well.
I haven't pushed very hard for getting this fixed, as I figured I was one of those for-just-one-user cases. That and it's easy enough to patch.
Anyway, I have a boot(8)-based payload that I've been working on occasionally, It's in an ugly-ish, somewhat hard-coded, but none-the-less working state. Also, it's an easy-ish route to loading NetBSD/amd64's ELF64 kernels.
Jonathan Kollasch
-
Jonathan A. Kollasch -
Mart Raudsepp -
Pierre Pronchery