Hello,
See the attached (trivial) patch, inspired by the older buildsystem. This fixes Myles' and my compilation issues.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Cristi MagherusanCristi.Magherusan@net.utcluj.ro wrote:
Hello,
See the attached (trivial) patch, inspired by the older buildsystem. This fixes Myles' and my compilation issues.
If we have name space collisions between coreboot and libgcc, what will happen? If somebody links in something in libgcc that tries to do a linux system call, what will happen?
If you're sure this is the way to go, then, with reluctance,
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com
(and only because Plan 9 is also linked against Plan 9's libc :-)
Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 08:30 -0700 schrieb ron minnich:
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com
(and only because Plan 9 is also linked against Plan 9's libc :-)
libgcc != libc
And if someone actually uses the system compiler (a generic i386-elf compiler has no OS dependencies in the resulting code, except for bugs), they're on their own anyway.
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi patrick.georgi@coresystems.de
Patrick
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 17:20:16 Cristi Magherusan wrote:
Hello,
See the attached (trivial) patch, inspired by the older buildsystem. This fixes Myles' and my compilation issues.
And mine too!
Acked-by: Harald Gutmann harald.gutmann@gmx.net
revision 4584.
Kind regards, Harald
See the attached (trivial) patch, inspired by the older buildsystem. This fixes Myles' and my compilation issues.
Thanks! Myles