attached.requires my earlier gx2 patches to work.
ron
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:28 AM, ron minnichrminnich@gmail.com wrote:
attached.requires my earlier gx2 patches to work.
Acked-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
My only minor concern is the licensing of the Kconfig files. Shouldn't this one have your copyright if it has one?
Thanks, Myles
i don't think we should have copyright in Kconfig files. Linux doesn't.
ron
On 28.08.2009 16:53, ron minnich wrote:
i don't think we should have copyright in Kconfig files. Linux doesn't.
Agreed. Kconfig files are often so small that a copyright header would inflate the size by over 100%. Besides that, their content may be too small to be copyrightable.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On 8/28/09 7:00 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 28.08.2009 16:53, ron minnich wrote:
i don't think we should have copyright in Kconfig files. Linux doesn't.
Agreed. Kconfig files are often so small that a copyright header would inflate the size by over 100%. Besides that, their content may be too small to be copyrightable.
plus their "creational depth" is pretty much zero, about as high as the result of "ls /tmp" ;-)
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Myles Watsonmylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:28 AM, ron minnichrminnich@gmail.com wrote:
attached.requires my earlier gx2 patches to work.
Acked-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Committed revision 4617.
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Myles Watson -
ron minnich -
Stefan Reinauer