This is the same patch I posted earlier which adds legacybios to buildrom. It has some options hardcoded in hardcode.diff because it seems like the easiest way to keep the configuration in one place.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Thanks, Myles
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:53:46PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
This is the same patch I posted earlier which adds legacybios to buildrom. It has some options hardcoded in hardcode.diff because it seems like the easiest way to keep the configuration in one place.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
Looks good and it's build-tested by me. Will test on hardware later.
Uwe.
On 26/06/08 16:26 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:53:46PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
This is the same patch I posted earlier which adds legacybios to buildrom. It has some options hardcoded in hardcode.diff because it seems like the easiest way to keep the configuration in one place.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
Looks good and it's build-tested by me. Will test on hardware later.
As per Stepan it is his intention that LegacyBIOS be part of coreboot-v3, so I don't want to mess with his efforts. Of course, that leaves the question of what we want to do for v2.
Can we wait for his guidance before committing?
Jordan
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jordan Crouse jordan.crouse@amd.com wrote:
On 26/06/08 16:26 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:53:46PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
This is the same patch I posted earlier which adds legacybios to buildrom. It has some options hardcoded in hardcode.diff because it seems like the easiest way to keep the configuration in one place.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
Looks good and it's build-tested by me. Will test on hardware later.
As per Stepan it is his intention that LegacyBIOS be part of coreboot-v3, so I don't want to mess with his efforts. Of course, that leaves the question of what we want to do for v2.
Can we wait for his guidance before committing?
Sure. I don't think adding support for a payload to buildrom should interfere with anything, but I can wait for his input.
Thanks, Myles
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jordan Crouse jordan.crouse@amd.com wrote:
On 26/06/08 16:26 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:53:46PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
This is the same patch I posted earlier which adds legacybios to buildrom. It has some options hardcoded in hardcode.diff because it seems like the easiest way to keep the configuration in one place.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
Rev 208.
Thanks, Myles
Looks good and it's build-tested by me. Will test on hardware later.
As per Stepan it is his intention that LegacyBIOS be part of coreboot-v3, so I don't want to mess with his efforts. Of course, that leaves the question of what we want to do for v2.
Can we wait for his guidance before committing?
Sure. I don't think adding support for a payload to buildrom should interfere with anything, but I can wait for his input.
Thanks, Myles
On 01/07/08 14:59 -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jordan Crouse jordan.crouse@amd.com wrote:
On 26/06/08 16:26 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:53:46PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
This is the same patch I posted earlier which adds legacybios to buildrom. It has some options hardcoded in hardcode.diff because it seems like the easiest way to keep the configuration in one place.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
Rev 208.
Was this renamed or does that still need to be done?
Thanks, Myles
Looks good and it's build-tested by me. Will test on hardware later.
As per Stepan it is his intention that LegacyBIOS be part of coreboot-v3, so I don't want to mess with his efforts. Of course, that leaves the question of what we want to do for v2.
Can we wait for his guidance before committing?
Sure. I don't think adding support for a payload to buildrom should interfere with anything, but I can wait for his input.
Thanks, Myles
-----Original Message----- From: Jordan Crouse [mailto:jordan.crouse@amd.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 3:18 PM To: Myles Watson Cc: Uwe Hermann; Coreboot; Stefan Reinauer Subject: Re: Add legacybios to buildrom
On 01/07/08 14:59 -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Jordan Crouse jordan.crouse@amd.com
wrote:
On 26/06/08 16:26 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:53:46PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
This is the same patch I posted earlier which adds legacybios to buildrom. It has some options hardcoded in hardcode.diff because
it
seems like the easiest way to keep the configuration in one place.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de
Rev 208.
Was this renamed or does that still need to be done?
I'll rename it when Kevin renames the URL.
Thanks, Myles
Thanks, Myles
Looks good and it's build-tested by me. Will test on hardware later.
As per Stepan it is his intention that LegacyBIOS be part of
coreboot-v3,
so I don't want to mess with his efforts. Of course, that leaves the question of what we want to do for v2.
Can we wait for his guidance before committing?
Sure. I don't think adding support for a payload to buildrom should interfere with anything, but I can wait for his input.
Thanks, Myles
-- Jordan Crouse Systems Software Development Engineer Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
-
Jordan Crouse -
Myles Watson -
Uwe Hermann