Buildrom grub2 bump revision

[Myles Watson]

Grub2 didn't boot for me until I updated to the latest.  Tested in
hardware on Tyan s2895.

I still think it would make more sense to default to the latest and
keep a "safe" revision number with a safe mode option.

Signed-off-by: Myles Watson

Thanks,
Myles

[Myles Watson]

Such a simple patch you could have just imagined it.  Right?

- Myles
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> Grub2 didn't boot for me until I updated to the latest.  Tested in
> hardware on Tyan s2895.
>
> I still think it would make more sense to default to the latest and
> keep a "safe" revision number with a safe mode option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Myles Watson
>
> Thanks,
> Myles

[Ward Vandewege]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:27:12AM -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> Such a simple patch you could have just imagined it.  Right?
> Myles
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Myles Watson  wrote:
> > Grub2 didn't boot for me until I updated to the latest.  Tested in
> > hardware on Tyan s2895.
> >
> > I still think it would make more sense to default to the latest and
> > keep a "safe" revision number with a safe mode option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson

Acked-by: Ward Vandewege

Thanks,
Ward.

[Myles Watson]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ward Vandewege [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 10:35 AM
> To: Myles Watson
> Cc: Coreboot
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] Buildrom grub2 bump revision
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:27:12AM -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> > Such a simple patch you could have just imagined it.  Right?
> > Myles
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Myles Watson
>
> wrote:
> > > Grub2 didn't boot for me until I updated to the latest.  Tested in
> > > hardware on Tyan s2895.
> > >
> > > I still think it would make more sense to default to the latest and
> > > keep a "safe" revision number with a safe mode option.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson
>
> Acked-by: Ward Vandewege

Rev 256.

Thanks,
Myles