On 12/13/2013 11:24 PM, Gabe Black wrote:
If you don't want to hear it, ignore it. We shouldn't break things just so people with mistaken opinions are happy, nor how long it took to rearrange things into a broken state.
What exactly are we breaking?
Processors which need microcode updates?
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:28 PM, mrnuke mr.nuke.me@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/13/2013 11:24 PM, Gabe Black wrote:
If you don't want to hear it, ignore it. We shouldn't break things just so people with mistaken opinions are happy, nor how long it took to rearrange things into a broken state.
What exactly are we breaking?
Hello! What are we breaking? Tradition. Also reality. And probably a heck of a lot of rules and means and methods. Plus some physical laws regarding technology, that we won't know we've broken, until our new gadget works, and probably starts up and does everything properly, unlike its earlier boot mechanism.
Even though I'm not the fellow wearing the specialty hat in this gathering, I believe we should drop this discussion, from the list. If any of you would then want to continue it, do so off list, and include a precis containing the salient points for us. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:28 AM, mrnuke mr.nuke.me@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/13/2013 11:24 PM, Gabe Black wrote:
If you don't want to hear it, ignore it. We shouldn't break things just so people with mistaken opinions are happy, nor how long it took to rearrange things into a broken state.
What exactly are we breaking?
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
-
Gabe Black -
Gregg Levine -
mrnuke