[flashrom] [patch] Warning in satasii.c with GCC 4.4.0

[Urja Rannikko]

Hi all,

log:
Fix warning in satasii.c.
This fix is simple as in i think it doesnt change the code logic at
all and doesnt add a level of parentheses (ugly),
but i can't test as i dont have the necessary hardware.

Signed-off-by: Urja Rannikko

I got this warning (as error) compiling flashrom with gcc 4.4.0:
cc -Os -Wall -Werror   -c -o satasii.o satasii.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
satasii.c: In function ‘satasii_init’:
satasii.c:67: error: suggest parentheses around operand of ‘!’ or
change ‘&’ to ‘&&’ or ‘!’ to ‘~’

Patch also inlined:
Index: satasii.c
===================================================================
--- satasii.c	(revision 557)
+++ satasii.c	(working copy)
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
    sii_bar = physmap("SATA SIL registers", addr, 0x100) + reg_offset;

/* Check if ROM cycle are OK. */
-	if ((id != 0x0680) && (!(mmio_readl(sii_bar)) & (1 << 26)))
+	if ((id != 0x0680) && ((!mmio_readl(sii_bar)) & (1 << 26)))
    	printf("Warning: Flash seems unconnected.\n");

return 0;

[flashrom] [patch] Warning in satasii.c with GCC 4.4.0

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 31.05.2009 21:55, Urja Rannikko wrote:
> This fix is simple as in i think it doesnt change the code logic at
> all and doesnt add a level of parentheses (ugly),
> but i can't test as i dont have the necessary hardware.
> Index: satasii.c
>
> --- satasii.c	(revision 557)
> +++ satasii.c	(working copy)
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
>    sii_bar = physmap("SATA SIL registers", addr, 0x100) + reg_offset;
>
> /* Check if ROM cycle are OK. */
> if ((id != 0x0680) && (!(mmio_readl(sii_bar)) & (1 << 26)))
> if ((id != 0x0680) && ((!mmio_readl(sii_bar)) & (1 << 26)))

I think the original is ambiguous and the suggested change is incorrect.
Hopefully correct code follows:

if ((id != 0x0680) && (!(mmio_readl(sii_bar) & (1 << 26))))

The code tries to test if a given bit is not set.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

[flashrom] [patch] Warning in satasii.c with GCC 4.4.0

[Urja Rannikko]

> I think the original is ambiguous and the suggested change is incorrect.
> Hopefully correct code follows:
>
> if ((id != 0x0680) && (!(mmio_readl(sii_bar) & (1 << 26))))
>
> The code tries to test if a given bit is not set.

Sorry, I failed to understand that (was wondering of that code...).
Now i'm mystified of how the sign-off/ack procedure works when you
fixed the only change in my patch ... Who should make the new patch +
sign off?

[flashrom] [patch] Warning in satasii.c with GCC 4.4.0

[Peter Stuge]

Urja Rannikko wrote:
> Now i'm mystified of how the sign-off/ack procedure works when you
> fixed the only change in my patch ... Who should make the new patch
> sign off?

It doesn't matter. Since Carl-Daniel didn't send a new patch or
simply commit with fix, you are more than welcome to send a new
patch with your sigoff. In similar situations, sometimes people
mention input they have received, other times they don't.

//Peter

[flashrom] [patch] Warning in satasii.c with GCC 4.4.0

[Urja Rannikko]

Fix warning in satasii.c when compiling with gcc 4.4.0.

Signed-off-by: Urja Rannikko

Index: satasii.c
===================================================================
--- satasii.c	(revision 557)
+++ satasii.c	(working copy)
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
    sii_bar = physmap("SATA SIL registers", addr, 0x100) + reg_offset;

/* Check if ROM cycle are OK. */
-	if ((id != 0x0680) && (!(mmio_readl(sii_bar)) & (1 << 26)))
+	if ((id != 0x0680) && (!(mmio_readl(sii_bar) & (1 << 26))))
    	printf("Warning: Flash seems unconnected.\n");

return 0;

[flashrom] [patch] Warning in satasii.c with GCC 4.4.0

[Uwe Hermann]

On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:26:31AM +0300, Urja Rannikko wrote:
> Fix warning in satasii.c when compiling with gcc 4.4.0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Urja Rannikko

Yep, thanks! Committed in r558.

Uwe.