add a core2 stage1.
core2 stage/01 now builds.
Get a stop_ap out of a mainboard and into the via cpu support where it belongs.
ron
On 14.11.2008 05:46, ron minnich wrote:
add a core2 stage1.
core2 stage/01 now builds.
Get a stop_ap out of a mainboard and into the via cpu support where it belongs.
ron
Index: arch/x86/Makefile Add core2 stage1.c dependency
Index: arch/x86/intel/core2/stage1.c Initial core2 disable_car and stop_ap disable_car is wrong but we can fix that tomorrow -- it's core 2 day on friday!
Index: arch/x86/via/stage1.c Add empty stop_ap()
Index: mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m/stage1_debug.c Cleanup Index: mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m/initram.c Cleanup Index: mainboard/jetway/j7f2/stage1.c Remove definition of stop_ap; this belongs in the cpu! Index: southbridge/intel/i82801gx/libsmbus.c Fix definition of TIMEOUT (i.e. remove it)
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Regards, Carl-Daniel
well that was a fast ack!Committed revision 1019.
Here's the next patch. Sorry about the name, I did not think I'd get to this tonight so was saving it for stefan.
ron
ron minnich wrote:
Index: northbridge/intel/i945/stage1.c Make statics non-static (we don't do buildrom any more) Index: northbridge/intel/i945/raminit.c remove snarf-o that left k8 in (I used wrong script I guess?)
Index: southbridge/intel/i82801gx/libsmbus.c Corrections (minor)
Index: southbridge/intel/i82801gx/stage1_smbus.c static to global
Index: mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m/stage1_debug.c don't include statictree.c
Index: mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m/stage1.c Remove functions that have to be in initram.
Index: mainboard/kontron/986lcd-m/initram.c Add functions. This is all about splitting auto.c into stage1 and initram. stage1 is very small and limited.
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@gmail.com
Acked-by: Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se
Committed revision 1020.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:09:34PM -0800, ron minnich wrote:
Index: northbridge/intel/i945/stage1.c Make statics non-static (we don't do buildrom any more)
Can you explain this comment? What does buildrom have to do with the fact that the function is static or not?
Uwe.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:09:34PM -0800, ron minnich wrote:
Index: northbridge/intel/i945/stage1.c Make statics non-static (we don't do buildrom any more)
Can you explain this comment? What does buildrom have to do with the fact that the function is static or not?
it means my fingers typed buildrom when they were supposed to type romcc.
I can't believe I did that.
ron