svn@coreboot.org wrote:
GA-MA78GM-S2H
The board was misidentified as a GIGABYTE GA-MA78G-DS3H
So the logic I've applied in similar cases before is that if it works but just reports the wrong board name I would not care, lest the board enable list becomes very long.
I'd rather have a board name something like GA-MA78x than distinct entries.
//Peter
On 19.05.2009 01:27, Peter Stuge wrote:
svn@coreboot.org wrote:
GA-MA78GM-S2H
The board was misidentified as a GIGABYTE GA-MA78G-DS3H
I'd rather have a board name something like GA-MA78x than distinct entries.
Absolutely agreed.
Regards, Carl-Daniel