On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Stojsavljevic, Zoran < zoran.stojsavljevic@intel.com> wrote:
I really don't want to be rude here, not trying to be, but there's a lot
of talk on this issue that is driven by ignorance. And the people who know what's going on, can't talk; the people who don't know, talk :-) Twas ever thus.
People who do know, in most cases do NOT want to talk (in some they cannot), but people who do NOT know, they always talk, even they're not asked to!
Let's be polite. After all, this is an open source community forum, the operative word being *open*. Not "open when mrnuke approves" or "open only to those with insider knowledge."
Thanks for your hard work here, by the way! I would certainly like to see components of FSP open up over time, however coreboot+FSP is still a lot better than no coreboot at all in my opinion. It also seems like a logical step to help vendors take control of their platforms and see the benefits that increased transparency can bring.
-
David Hendricks