On 5/4/10 10:07 AM, Nathan Williams wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nathan Williams nathan@traverse.com.au
device pci 1.0 on end
device pci 1.1 on end
device pci 1.0 on end # Northbridge
device pci 1.1 on end # Graphics
device pci 1.2 on end # AES
What's the impact of that change?
Stefan
On 5/05/2010 12:15 AM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
On 5/4/10 10:07 AM, Nathan Williams wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nathan Williams nathan@traverse.com.au
device pci 1.0 on end
device pci 1.1 on end
device pci 1.0 on end # Northbridge
device pci 1.1 on end # Graphics
device pci 1.2 on end # AES
What's the impact of that change?
Stefan
I don't think it makes any difference. I just added it for completeness/documentation.
Nathan
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Nathan Williams nathan@traverse.com.au wrote:
On 5/05/2010 12:15 AM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
On 5/4/10 10:07 AM, Nathan Williams wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nathan Williams nathan@traverse.com.au
- device pci 1.0 on end
- device pci 1.1 on end
- device pci 1.0 on end # Northbridge
- device pci 1.1 on end # Graphics
- device pci 1.2 on end # AES
What's the impact of that change?
Stefan
I don't think it makes any difference. I just added it for completeness/documentation.
In general we try to only specify the devices that must be specified because they have special driver needs. It keeps the device trees cleaner. Things that can be probed for and initialized by the generic code are better left alone. Maybe a comment in the lx code would be a good way to document other functions.
Thanks, Myles