Name change for romfs

[Peter Stuge]

Is someone owning this issue?

If not, will anything else happen with the code this weekend?

Thanks

//Peter

[Stefan Reinauer]

Peter Stuge wrote:
> Is someone owning this issue?

Yes, Jordan wrote the code, he should decide. That's how we handled such
cases before.

Stefan

[ron minnich]

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Stefan Reinauer  wrote:
> Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Is someone owning this issue?
>
> Yes, Jordan wrote the code, he should decide. That's how we handled such
> cases before.
>
> Stefan

Jordan, don't know if you saw the discussion, one possibility was to
change to cbfs (coreboot fs)

ron

> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Stefan Reinauer 
> wrote:
> > Peter Stuge wrote:
> > > Is someone owning this issue?
> >
> > Yes, Jordan wrote the code, he should decide. That's how we handled such
> > cases before.
> >
> > Stefan
>
> Jordan, don't know if you saw the discussion, one possibility was to
> change to cbfs (coreboot fs)
>
> ron

Normally, I wouldn't want to make a unilateral decision like this - I'm
not in the community any longer, and you guys have to live with the name. 
But in this case, I honestly think that that the romfs concept is
essential to the long term health of the project, and I don't want to
derail it over something silly like a name.  Lets go with cbfs.

Jordan

[Joseph Smith]

On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 22:24:54 -0600 (MDT), [e-mail] wrote:
> I'm not in the community any longer,

Why not? Did something happen to discourage you Jordan?