proposed cbfs change for 'unitialized' flash

[ron minnich]

attached.

ron

[ron minnich]

I comment in the attach that it did not seem to work. Turns out that
was a different problem.

This patch works fine for me.

Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich

[Peter Stuge]

ron minnich wrote:
> I comment in the attach that it did not seem to work. Turns out that
> was a different problem.
>
> This patch works fine for me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich

Acked-by: Peter Stuge

[Peter Stuge]

ron minnich wrote:
> At the same time, "erased" value has been "1" on every EEPROM or
> FLASH I've used for some time now. Making this a settable value may
> not be that useful and could cause trouble.

Doesn't matter much to me. It's in a single place so hardcoding would
be fine too.

//Peter

[ron minnich]

Thanks,

Committed revision 4290.

ron
p.s. Man, we're gonna need a party for rev 5000.