See patch.
Some directory names have to be done (as described in the patch preamble) to make this work, I left them out of the patch for improved reviewability.
Regards, Patrick
Am 19.05.2009 12:34, schrieb Patrick Georgi:
See patch.
Some directory names have to be done (as described in the patch preamble) to make this work, I left them out of the patch for improved reviewability.
Oh, I forgot one bit: the PPC stuff is work in progress, several things are stubbed and untested. This patch is more about the infrastructure than about the PPC implementation.
Patrick
Patrick Georgi wrote:
Oh, I forgot one bit: the PPC stuff is work in progress, several things are stubbed and untested.
Most of it seems to be x86 copypaste.
This patch is more about the infrastructure than about the PPC implementation.
I'd be happy to ack empty implementations rather than x86 code in powerpc files, which is not so likely to work. :)
//Peter
On 19.05.2009 18:30 Uhr, Peter Stuge wrote:
Patrick Georgi wrote:
Oh, I forgot one bit: the PPC stuff is work in progress, several things are stubbed and untested.
Most of it seems to be x86 copypaste.
This patch is more about the infrastructure than about the PPC implementation.
I'd be happy to ack empty implementations rather than x86 code in powerpc files, which is not so likely to work. :)
They are there on purpose, and, as you no doubt recognized, they're commented out. The idea is to allow the actual implementor to see what code actually belongs there.
Stefan
On 19.05.2009 12:34 Uhr, Patrick Georgi wrote:
See patch.
Some directory names have to be done (as described in the patch preamble) to make this work, I left them out of the patch for improved reviewability.
Regards, Patrick
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de
-
Patrick Georgi -
Peter Stuge -
Stefan Reinauer